Re: Does hypochorionic hemorrhage alters triplo-test results?'reply'

From: Latha Natarajan (nattu@bgl.vsnl.net.in)
Thu Apr 1 21:16:49 2004


Maternal Serum AFP levels go up with haemorrhage.

LN.

>----- Original Message -----
From: "art fougner, md" <evsono@pipeline.com> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:19 AM Subject: Re: Does hypochorionic hemorrhage alters triplo-test results?'reply'

> But how were the maternal serum screens specifically affected by
> "threatened miscarriage"?
>
> art
>
> At Wed, 31 Mar 2004, AFPPLUS3@aol.com wrote:
> >
> >This may help you with regards to adjusting the patients risk...
> >
> >Threatened abortion: A risk factor for poor pregnancy outcome, a
> >population-based screening study
> >Joshua L. Weiss, MD,* Fergal D. Malone, MD, John Vidaver, MA, Robert H.
Bal , > >MD,
> >David A. Nyberg, MD, Christine H. Comstock, MD, Gary D. Hankins, MD,
Richar > >L. Berkowitz, MD, Susan J. Gross, MD, Lorraine Dugoff, MD, Ilan E.
> >Timor-Tritsch, MD, Mary E. Dâ?TAlton, MD, for the FASTER Consortium
> >Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY
> >â?"
> >Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients
with > >first-trimester threatened abortion are at increased risk for poor
pregnanc > >outcome.
> >Study design: A large prospective multicenter database was studied.
Subject > >were divided into three groups: (1) no bleeding, (2) light bleeding, and
(3 > >heavy bleeding. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses
w re > >used.
> >Results: The study comprised 16,506 patients: 14,160 patients without
> >bleeding, 2094 patients with light bleeding, and 252 patients with heavy
bl eding. > >Patients with vaginal bleeding, light or heavy, were more likely to
experie ce a > >spontaneous loss before 24 weeks of gestation (odds ratio, 2.5 and 4.2,
> >respectively) and cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 1.1 and 1.4,
respectively) Light > >bleeding subjects were more likely to have preeclampsia (odds ratio,
1.5), > >preterm delivery (odds ratio, 1.3), and placental abruption (odds ratio,
1. ). > >Heavy vaginal bleeding subjects were more likely to have intrauterine
growt > >restriction (odds ratio, 2.6), preterm delivery (odds ratio, 3.0),
preterm > >premature rupture of membranes (odds ratio, 3.2), and placental abruption
( dds > >ratio, 3.6).
> >Conclusion: First-trimester vaginal bleeding is an independent risk
factor > >for adverse obstetric outcome that is directly proportional to the amount
o > >bleeding.
> > 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
> >KEY WORDS
> >Threatened abortion
> >Spontaneous pregnancy
> >loss
> >Preterm delivery
> >Placental abruption
> >Preterm premature
> >rupture of membranes
> >â?"
> >First-trimester vaginal bleeding is a common complication that affects
16% o > >25% of all pregnancies.1,2 When pregnant patients have bleeding, it may
cau e > >stress and anxiety for the mother-to-be about the future outcome of the
> >pregnancy. In general, the incidence of
> >spontaneous abortion after first-trimester bleeding is quoted to be 50%
> >before sonographic evaluation for fetal viability.1,3 If a viable fetus
is oted at > >ultrasound examination after first-trimester vaginal bleeding, 95% to 98%
o > >such pregnancies will still continue beyond 20
> >weeks of gestation.1,4 Supported by grant No. RO1 HD 38652 from the
National > >Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Child Health and Human
> >Development.
> >* Reprint requests: Joshua L. Weiss, MD, Columbia Presbyterian
> >Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, PH-16-66, New York, NY 10032.
> >E-mail: jw791@columbia.edu
> >http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajog
> >
> >American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2004) 190, 745-50
> >
> >Leonard H. Kellner
> >Lenetix Medical Screening Laboratory, Inc.
> >
> >CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender
tha > >may be confidential, legally privileged, proprietary or otherwise
protected > >from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or
entit to > >whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
> >responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any
use, > >disclosure, copying, distribution, or printing of the contents of this
emai is > >strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please inform
th > >sending party by an e-mail reply, delete the email from your computer
syste and > >shred any paper copies of the email.
>
> --
> art fougner, md
> ich bin ein New Yorker




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:36:07 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.