![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: The fetus answerFrom: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu)Mon Feb 9 09:54:42 2004
Most reasonable comment I have seen yet on these images... Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM Assistant Professor & Director Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- --------------------------------------------------------------- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Suzy H Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 8:58 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: The fetus answer My answer: These fetuses are actually both female. The conjoined fetus on the right has a more prominent clitoris. I have seen full term female infants with ambiguous genitalia to have an even more prominent clitoris, and more prominent labia resembling a penis without foreskin and testicles. Suzy Hettena RDMS
> ----- Original Message ----- It it is true discordant gender in conjoined twins, it is beyond my understanding. The only possible explanation I could come up with, and a far stretch at that, would be two eggs fertilized, implanted at exactly the same time and place in the uterus and grew together... but it is really doubtful. Goes against all we know of embryology. Very interesting. Terry On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 14:53:01 -0600 "Philippe Jeanty" <COW@TheFetus.net> writes: Looks impossible.. but there you can see it.. so how did this happened ? ________________________________
-- ________________________________ From: Terry J DuBose [mailto:tjdubose@juno.com] Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 1:54 PM To: cow@TheFetus.net Subject: The fetus answer
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:32:25 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.