|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: 'Terrifying Sonogram' Dilemma: patient with single (new) 'soft marker' --From: Helena Stroganova (nikver@ukr.net)Sat May 31 07:44:15 2003
At Fri, 30 May 2003, art fougner, md wrote: > >Resolution is in the eye of the beholder. That being said, in this day >of shrinking reimbursement, it's not surprising that cost-considerations >may rule the day. Interestingly, the proliferation of "markers" >mirrored the improvements in resolution. Apparently, resolution does >have its price. > >As always - just my opinion. I could be wrong. > >art > >At Fri, 30 May 2003, Terry J. DuBose wrote: >> >>Good question... seems it should be up to the sonographer/diagnostician person/team. But often it may be up to an administrator that wouldn't know a synechia from an amnion if it was pointed out to them. >> >>Terry J DuBose, M.S., RDMS >>Little Rock, Arkansas USA >> >>ultrasound@obgyn.net writes: >>Here's a thought; does anyone on the list believe that this issue could be the result of the poor quality ultrasound equipment, i.e. not maintained correctly or some low-cost job with lower than adequate resolution? Clinicians rely on the image quality and Doppler, but who in the chain of command is responsible for the quality of the equipment? >>Bill Phillips > >-- >art fougner, md >ich bin ein New Yorker >
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:35:47 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.