-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Objectionable mailings From: Dr. Fazeel (fazeel@abt.wol.net.pk) Thu Apr 24 16:23:34 2003 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Terry J. DuBose: "Re: Objectionable mailings" Previous message: Allen Worrall: "Re: Objectionable mailings" I propose that for a few weeks, all the mail first goes to Terry or some other responsible person and then all the objectionable stuff is deleted and then mails sent to the list. When those sneakers get tired, we can reintroduce open participation. Of course that would mean "manual screening and time consuming". fazeel -------Original Message------- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net Date: Thursday, April 24, 2003 2:09:12 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Objectionable mailings The problem of SPAM is becoming much worse over the entire internet. The perpetrators have learned how to make their spam appear to come from legitimate addresses such as obgyn.net, yahoo.com, msn.com. This makes it difficult for Spam filters to work: although I could tell my filter to "kill all mail from obgyn.net, msn.com, yahoo.com, I would be throwing the baby out with the bath water. And the spamers can change the overall address with each mailing. For example, if I filter on 12345@yahoo.com my filter will stop all mail with that address. But the next mailing from the perp will be from 22345@yahoo.com, and my filter will let it through. I then create a new filter for 22345@yahoo.com, but the perps will continue to use a different address. The spam filter helps, but recently I have noted more and more spam gets through the filter. -- So I agree that the answer is not each person trying to filter the mail they receive. We have to have a more fundamental approach, which means government most likely. Allen Joseph A Worrall MD RDMS OB/GYN Ultrasound at the Fairbanks Clinic Fairbanks, Alaska, USA jworrall@alaska.net http://www.obgynsono.com >----- Original Message ----- From: Terry J DuBose To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Re: Objectionable mailings Dear Sue, I am probably as good as any to ask about this... me and the folks in Austin... Bruce, Roberta, et al. This issue first came up soon after OBGYN-L went on the web. Unfortunately, as you say "Whoever sends them is getting sneakier so it's difficult to filter them out with software rules". Bruce and crew try to filter them, but they are overwhelming. The problem is not unique to OBGYN.net, but exists on any large, successful, OPEN ACCESS, list. We discussed going behind a wall and charging a fee about 5 years ago, but that adds to the expense and limits access. The problem is worse now. It is difficult enough with patients who should be seeing a medical person rather than asking for advice long distance, but the SPAM is truly obnoxious. Legislation has been proposed in Washington (not that all SPAM originates in the USA), but so far the "business interests" like the Chambers of Commerce organization have opposed limiting SPAM because they call it "advertising". With our current administration being a corporate culture, I do not expect to see much support for limiting any kind of commerce. Please don't blame the American people, most of us did not vote for Bush... and more will not soon. My apologies to any Republicans here, and I don't mean to introduce polemics to an ultrasound discussion group, but this is becoming a serious problem. Until the corporate culture currently in control of the USA's administration says stop, I see little hope. If anyone has suggestions or wants to pay for a lobbying group to oppose the Chambers of Commerce, et al... please suggest what to do. Sorry I don't have better answers... Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS Chair, Ultrasound section OBGYN.net Little Rock, Arkansas USA On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:46:18 +1000 "Sue Davies" <sue@aiu.edu.au> writes: Excellence in practical education...... Programs built to suit the individual....... Australian Institute of Ultrasound P.O.Box 434 Mermaid Beach Queensland 4218 Australia Phone 61 07 5526 6655 Fax 61 07 55266041 Dear Terry I'm not sure if you're the correct person to be asking but is there any way we can stop the increasing numbers of thoroughly objectionable emails we are receiving via obgyn? Whoever sends them is getting sneakier so it's difficult to filter them out with software rules. Cheers Sue Sue Davies Program Director Australian Institute of Ultrasound Next message: Terry J. DuBose: "Re: Objectionable mailings" Previous message: Allen Worrall: "Re: Objectionable mailings"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:32:07 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.