![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Unilateral, large, hyperechoic kidneyFrom: sefa kelekci (sefa051@hotmail.com)Wed Apr 23 15:23:58 2003
At Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Recep Has wrote: > >I have detected a large (36x18mm), hyperechoic kidney in a 24 week >fetus. The appearence of the kidney was similar to infantyl type of >policystic kidney (it was homogenously hyperechoic, there was no tumor >(ie. nephroblastoma, or congenital mesoblastic nephroma) or cystic >structures in the parenchym, and the pelvis renalis visible but not full >with urine). >However, the other kidney was normal in size (31x18mm) and appearence. >Both adrenal glands were normal in size, localization and appearence. >Amniotic fluid volume was normal and the largest diameter of the bladder >was 17mm. Fetus had no additional abnormality. > >I looked for if ARPKD (infantyl polycystic disease) could be >unilateral(at least in this stage of the pregnancy), but found no >information. > >(I will try to upload the images) > >Is there any comment on this? > >-- >Recep Has >University of Istanbul, Faculty of Medicine >Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Prenatal Diagnosis Unit >
-- Recep hocam nerelerde karşılaşıyoruz değerli hocam Ben süleymaniye den Dr sefa sanırım o vaka bize geldi açıkcası bizde aynı kuşkuları taşıyoruz ailenin de istegi üzerine vakayı takip ediyoruz şu anda 21 haftalık yine ASV normal mesaneyi izleyemedik ama asit gelişti yinede aile takip edilmesini istedi. Eğer aynı vaka ise ailenin 2 tane IPCKD li infant öyküsü var. Selamlar saygılar sefa kelekci 0 532 408 28 78
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:32:07 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.