Re: Unilateral, large, hyperechoic kidney

From: Terry J DuBose (tjdubose@juno.com)
Wed Feb 26 20:28:51 2003


This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

----__JNP_000_53f7.5478.363b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear Recep Has, we have your images and they are being formatted for the Editorial Advisory Board's review.

Thanks, Terry J DuBose, M.S., RDMS

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:40:28 -0600 recephas@superonline.com (Recep Has) writes:

I have detected a large (36x18mm), hyperechoic kidney in a 24 week fetus. The appearence of the kidney was similar to infantyl type of policystic kidney (it was homogenously hyperechoic, there was no tumor (ie. nephroblastoma, or congenital mesoblastic nephroma) or cystic structures in the parenchym, and the pelvis renalis visible but not full with urine).

However, the other kidney was normal in size (31x18mm) and appearence. Both adrenal glands were normal in size, localization and appearence. Amniotic fluid volume was normal and the largest diameter of the bladder was 17mm. Fetus had no additional abnormality.

I looked for if ARPKD (infantyl polycystic disease) could be unilateral(at least in this stage of the pregnancy), but found no information.

(I will try to upload the images)

Is there any comment on this?

--
Recep Has
University of Istanbul, Faculty of Medicine
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prenatal Diagnosis Unit

----__JNP_000_53f7.5478.363b Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

Dear Recep Has, we have your images and they are being formatted for the Editorial Advisory Board's review.
 
Thanks, Terry J DuBose, M.S., RDMS
 
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:40:28 -0600 recephas@superonline.com (Recep Has) writes:

I have detected a large (36x18mm), hyperechoic kidney in a 24 week fetus.  The appearence of the kidney was similar to infantyl type of policystic kidney (it was homogenously hyperechoic, there was no tumor (ie.  nephroblastoma, or congenital mesoblastic nephroma) or cystic structures in the parenchym, and the pelvis renalis visible but not full with urine).

 

However, the other kidney was normal in size (31x18mm) and appearence. Both adrenal glands were normal in size, localization and appearence. Amniotic fluid volume was normal and the largest diameter of the bladder was 17mm.  Fetus had no additional abnormality.

 

I looked for if ARPKD (infantyl polycystic disease) could be unilateral(at least in this stage of the pregnancy), but found no information.

 

(I will try to upload the images)

 

Is there any comment on this?

 

--

Recep Has

University of Istanbul, Faculty of Medicine

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Prenatal Diagnosis Unit

 

----__JNP_000_53f7.5478.363b--



recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:35:42 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.