-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Nasal bones: images From: Doc Gyneco (jmbr@wanadoo.fr) Thu Nov 28 13:33:15 2002 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Patrizia: "risk for down syndrome" Previous message: Philippe Coquel: "Thanksgiving" In reply to: Philippe Coquel: "Re: Nasal bones: images" le 27/11/02 16:38, Philippe Coquel : > in fact, in France, the true problem is to know the value of this marker in > a low risk population because more than 95% of patients have a sonography at > 12 weeks with a measure of nucal translucency and more than 80% serum > markers at 16 -17 weeks. > > The result is that , at 22 weeks, we have a low or very low-risk population. > > And the question is: What is now, the significance of nasal bone marker in > this population? The right question is : how many fetus do we lose because of amniocenteses in this low-low-risk population ? I think we lose more healthy fetus than we find out trisomies 21. I'm worry about that. In my opinion, after nuchal translucency and serum screening the genetic sonogram is a very dangerous tool for baby and mother. -- Bien tropicalement, Dr J-M BRIDERON (MD) Gyn-Obs ECHOLIST : liste de diffusion sur l'echographie gyn-obs http://www.gyneweb.fr/echolist.htm Next message: Patrizia: "risk for down syndrome" Previous message: Philippe Coquel: "Thanksgiving" In reply to: Philippe Coquel: "Re: Nasal bones: images"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:35:34 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.