|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: 4D IMAGINGFrom: DoctorJoe@aol.comWed Nov 20 11:21:18 2002
In a message dated 11/20/02 12:03:01, duboseterryj@uams.edu writes:
> But what about health care? True, we have found no documented harm from the And how do we get away from missed or incorrect diagnoses? Answer: Don't scan. Actually, if you're doing "social" scanning, then wouldn't you inform the patient up front that you're NOT looking real hard for subtle anomalies, and you shouldn't be held liable for missing something that a "regular" targetted scan would be expected to uncover? I don't see a problem with missed diagnoses in the context of cursory social scanning... What's your duty to the patient in that case? To give them a good picture to bond with. If it's clear up front that you're not looking, then you have no duty to look. Joe P.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:31:56 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.