Re: what is 4D- Joe
From: Terry J DuBose (tjdubose@juno.com)
Thu May 16 07:21:10 2002
That is to say... 3D in real-time, time being the 4th dimension. Terry J
DuBose
---------------------------------
On Thu, 16 May 2002 00:58:36 -0500 "Philippe Coquel"
---------------------------------
<philippe.coquel@wanadoo.fr> writes:
--
---------------------------------
> 3D with 16 vol/sec (Kretz GE )or 4 vol/sec (Philips ATL MEDISON)
>
> Ph Coquel
>> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DR. JOE ANTONY" <jscan@vsnl.com>
> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND"
> <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:57 AM
> Subject: what is 4D- Joe
>
> > I have heard of 3D ultrasound. But what is 4 D?
> > Joe.
> > India.
>> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Philippe Jeanty <Jeanty@TheFetus.net>
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> > <ultrasound@mail.medispecialty.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:43 PM
> > Subject: RE: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'
> >
> > > There is currently an excellent machine that does 3D and 4D.
> with very
> > good
> > > 2D and Doppler. We have had a few anomaly cases reviewed on it
> and it
> does
> > > very good. Be prepared to spend quite some time to polish the
> raw images
> > if
> > > you want presentation quality material. This is not very
> intuitive
> stuff.
> > > My first impression is that the most useful aspect for parents
> has been
> > the
> > > negative-bonding in case of sever anomalies. They perceive it
> very well.
> > Of
> > > course the 3D and 4D of normal fetuses is cute but I am not too
> sure
> worth
> > > the time.
> > >
> > > Build-in 3D is easier then add-on 3D (we had this before) Add-on
> works
> > very
> > > well and is a lot cheaper but requires even more training.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On
> Behalf Of art
> > > fougner, md
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:46 AM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> > > Subject: Re: 'Use of 3-D Ultrasound'
> > >
> > > anyone care to share his/her personal experience with 3D?
> specifically,
> > > am interested in opinions re: technology - software upgrade vs.
> > > hardware, learning curve, frequency of obtaining advert quality
> images,
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > art
> > >
> > > At Tue, 14 May 2002, Philippe Jeanty wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Hi Tonya,
> > > >I respect your personal feelings but this forum is for medical
> > > >professionals. This is not a forum to push one or another
> philosophy. I
> > > wish
> > > >you well in your grieving process.
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net]On
> Behalf Of
> > > >Roho1212@aol.com
> > > >Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:39 PM
> > > >To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> > > >Subject: "Use of 3-D Ultrasound"
> > > >
> > >
> >http://www.obgyn.net/avtranscripts/3dultrasound_atlanta2000.htm
> > > >To whom it may concern,
> > > >I do not know who to contact, but I thought I would start here.
> When I
> > saw
> > > >the commercial for 3D ultrasounds I was rivited to my chair. I
> work at
> > 1st
> > > >Choice Pregnancy Resource Center, and we have been praying for
> a way to
> > > show
> > > >the mothers that come to out center that the baby they carry
> inside is
> so
> > > >much more than a blob of tissue. If you knoe of anyway I can
> contact
> the
> > > >company that has this ultrasound, Please call me @ 903-792-5735
> or
> > > >902-899-0433. You see I have lived for 23 years with the shame
> and
> > physical
> > > >effects of an abortion. I beleive God has found a way to show
> us the
> > > >miricale of life each step of the way. I don't know your views
> on
> > > abortion,
> > > >but you can not image the impact this machine could have in our
> center.
> > > >please call me.
> > > >
> > > >serving Him faithfully,
> > > >Tonya Domokos
> > >
> > > --
> > > art fougner, md
> > > ich bin ein New Yorker
> > >
> >
>
