![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: ob profession (was postpartum intercourse)From: Robert J. Woolley (wooll005@gold.tc.umn.edu)Sat Jun 28 23:21:45 1997
In message <33B5DAE8.3F89@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu> writes: > Robert J. Woolley wrote: > > > >" Operative deliveries are not a valid indication for episiotomy." > > > >I knew that...just tried to give some slack to those who would argue that > midwives low epis rate is attributable to this difference... thanks for you > great info on this! > > Deborah Actually, we already know that the difference in epis rate is not due to differences in the patient population: Chambliss et al prospectively randomized patients to management by either the obstetric residentsÕ service or the midwivesÕ service within the same California hospital [22]. The participants continued their usual care without restriction. The primary intent of the study was to determine whether the previously observed discrepancy in cesarean section use between the two services was due to differences in case mix or differences in management styles; perineal damage was a secondary outcome variable. Presented with an essentially identical patient population, the midwives had a significantly lower rate of episiotomy (10.8%) than the residents (35.4%). When an episiotomy (mediolateral versus midline not reported) was performed, the midwives also had a lower likelihood of rectal extension (8% versus 22%), indicating a difference between the practitioners in the nature of the incision, other related management variables (such as the observed variance in operative vaginal deliveries), or both. Unfortunately, the authors did not clearly say whether any severe spontaneous lacerations occurred, so the overall rate of sphincter damage cannot be compared. They did, however, conclude that Òour study suggests that episiotomy may be associated with more perineal trauma.Ó BTW, the midwives accomplished this better outcome (more intact perinea) with shorter first stages and shorter second stages, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Woolley -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- St. Paul, Minnesota
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:20:05 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.