Re: CIN microinvasor

From: Bernard Cristalli (bcrist@club-internet.fr)
Thu Jun 5 17:01:34 1997


Ricardo Savaris wrote: >
> Dear netters:
>
> A collegue of my came yesterday with a case asking for a second opinion
>
> A 29 yold female did a PAP and result was CIN2. Another doctor performed a
> cone (with LEEP) surgery. The pathologist gave the following result:
> Microinvasor carcinoma. Impossible to assess the edges due to
> intense burning.
> widening cone. The pathologist report was:
> No evidence of cancer was found on the material examined.
> Now he is concern about it, because the patient wants to have children.
> Thanks in advance
--
1. What is done is done
2. No LEEP without a pathologic report through biopsy. It would have
avoided a surprise
3. Conisation is not a definitive obstacle to childbearing

--
Bernard Cristalli MD CNGOF
Paris - France
http://www.obgyn.net/corresp/cristalli.htm




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:20:03 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.