|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Thin uterus at C/Section, prev. IUFDFrom: David A. Nagey (dnagey@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu)Mon Sep 30 23:07:00 1996
At 03:18 PM 9/30/96 -0500, you wrote: Indeed, the uterine wall overlying the attachment >was millimeters thick, in the left cornual area. The placenta was grossly >normal, and detached easily,
My initial feeling is that this likely was a
>placenta accreta, and that all will be normal next time. how could it have been an accreta if it detached easily? I think not
However, I wonder
>if abnormal placentation could have accounted for her first IUFD. I think that this would be speculative at best. We don't even know that something is wrong yet are considering an unproven technique to diagnose an as yet undiagnosed condition.... I would "go for it" until there is clearly something to treat David -- David A. Nagey, MD, PhD, FACOG Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics telephone: (888) 800-8150 The Johns Hopkins Hospital FAX: (410) 849-2742 600 N. Wolfe Street, Houck 204 Baltimore, MD 21287-1204 email: dnagey@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:19:33 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.