![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 18 Week "Previa"From: Cláudio Sityá (csitya@femax.smnet.com.br)Sun Sep 29 08:36:55 1996
I agree that the diagnostic of placenta previa don't have to be doing before the 28 week, because 98 % of this in the first trimester don't will be previa at the thirst trimester, and the couples don't have to abstain if not bleeding occured. Cláudio Sityá csitya@smnet.com.br Santa Maria - RS Brasil
-- ---------- > De: Ronald Helm <ronhelm@ronhelm.seanet.com> > Para: Multiple recipients of list <ob-gyn-l@listserv.bcm.tmc.edu> > Assunto: 18 Week "Previa" > Data: Sexta-feira, 20 de Setembro de 1996 10:21 > > >>>I also don't ask patients to abstain with previa on 18wks scans, but > others in our group do require abstention! Is anyone aware of any study > data or standard regarding asymptomatic previa incidentally found on mid > trimester scan?? Is this a medical legal response?<<< > > The others in your group are asking couples to abstain from intercourse > based on a mistaken diagnosis of "placenta previa" on an 18 week scan? > This is ridiculous given the parapetetic (sp) nature of the placenta at > this time in pregnancy. What about all of these "previas" who haven't yet > been detected because they haven't been scanned. This is a prime example
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:19:33 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.