Re: Health Care

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Jul 28 13:36:18 2009


Right ... but the doctors were included as members of the "learned professions." Who knew we were tonsil nazis?

Art

At Tue, 28 Jul 2009, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: >
>In a message dated 7/28/09 8:11:24 AM, evsono@pipeline.com writes:
>
>> With the 1970's Supreme Court decision Goldfarb v Va State Bar,
>> physicians basically lost the ability to bargain collectively.
>>
>Actually, what Goldfarb did was to get the Court to opine that Congress did
>not intend any sweeping "learned profession" exclusion from the Sherman
>Act. The case was about lawyers, not doctors.
>
>The lawyers running a title examination scam wanted to say they weren't
>violating the anti-trust laws because they were a "learned profession," not
>part of "commerce." The Court said title exam work is a service, and the
>exchange of such a service for money is "commerce" in the common usage of that
>term.
>
>So the upshot is, "learned professions" can be prosecuted under the
>anti-trust laws for price-fixing and other anti-competitive activities. Here, it
>wasn't just an informal (or even formal) association of title attorneys. The
>schedule and its enforcement mechanism constituted price fixing since the
>record showed that the schedule, rather than being purely advisory, operated as
>a fixed, rigid price floor. The fee schedule was enforced through the
>prospect of professional discipline by the State Bar, by reason of attorneys'
>desire to comply with announced professional norms, and by the assurance that
>other lawyers would not compete by underbidding. In other words, the State
>Bar was "in on it" via the disciplinary process.
>
>Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975).
>
>I wonder how many MEDICAL boards are "in on it?" I'm absolutely sure a lot
>of "disruptive physician" cases are simply anti-competitive actions masked
>in administrative/quality assurance trappings. Et tu, Richard?
>
>Joe P.
>
>bcd=JulyExcfooterNO62)

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:15:21 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.