-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Was Incompetent os - tocolytics From: Raymond, Steve (Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au) Mon Jun 29 21:25:58 2009 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Raymond, Steve: "Re: To push or not to push. That is the question." Previous message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: NoEL-- who's rich" Your words: "What exactly is it that the one group does differently that produces better results?" It would take a different study to identify the answer to that! And that is the problem - how would you design such a study? Steve ________________________________ From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net on behalf of JD Stewart,MD -- ________________________________ Sent: Tue 30/06/2009 10:44 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Was Incompetent os - tocolytics Your words: "Not a blinded study - major confounding factor - different obstetricians. Proves only that one group was better than the other at managing potential preterm labour." What exactly is it that the one group does differently that produces better results? What properly blinded RCT data do you have to show that {whatever it is} works better? How do you (or any of us) know what we are doing is the absolutely right thing?? We cannot prove beyond all doubt the sun will rise tomorrow, but I'll bet it will... CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose. Next message: Raymond, Steve: "Re: To push or not to push. That is the question." Previous message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: NoEL-- who's rich"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:14:20 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.