Re: Interesting Case

From: Charlie Chambers (ricechaz@me.com)
Sun May 24 12:16:31 2009


--Boundary_(ID_fuyLJa4daNpu607HePm3wQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Perhaps, I should clarify. BTW, I think I get the notion that you are against this idea. No need to belabor the point.

We are not developing a breech induction protocol. We are working on a protocol for patients who do not have a successful external version, and who refuse a cesarean section despite being counseled regarding potential risks of vaginal delivery. The question of induction was whether we will allow the induction of a patient who declines a cesarean. We have had the same issue with patients with prior cesarean refusing transport to another facility for a trial of labor and refusing repeat cesarean.

This protocol is not a "breech induction" protocol, nor is it meant to encourage patients to have a vaginal breech delivery.

************************************************************************* Charlie Chambers Hood River, OR

--
cchamber@alumni.rice.edu

"No matter where you go... there you are." Dr. Buckaroo Banzai ************************************************************************

On May 24, 2009, at 8:54 AM, JD Stewart,MD wrote:

> At Sat, 23 May 2009, Charlie Chambers wrote: > >> >>> Maybe this is the place for the breech induction protocol! >> >> Really? Was that necessary? >> > > I apologize for the exclamation point, but there is a ring of truth, > as > there would be for an IUFD breech induction...in a VBAC or otherwise. > > Aside from the monitoring aspect, the presence of another "Breech > Induction" protocol at your hospital would come up as a local Standard > of Care...and this baby wouldn't fit. > > Awful/Simply Awful scenario- lost/damaged million dollar bill > baby/missed ultrasound/ trouble in labor/ 4th degree/ hemorrhage/ > hysterectomy/ blood transfusion/ hepatitis...DVT/stroke./ billion > dollar > career in a wheelchair... > > and the patient recalls she wanted an amnio but was talked out of it, > and begged you to do her C/S 2 days earlier... > > Which brings us WAY around to the wisdom in the Breech Protocol > staying > forever in committee... > > -- > JD Stewart, MD > MFM up all night, every night > 10 years later..

--Boundary_(ID_fuyLJa4daNpu607HePm3wQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Perhaps, I should clarify. BTW, I think I get the notion that you are against this idea. No need to belabor the point. 



We are not developing a breech induction protocol. We are working on a protocol for patients who do not have a successful external version, and who refuse a cesarean section despite being counseled regarding potential risks of vaginal delivery. The question of induction was whether we will allow the induction of a patient who declines a cesarean. We have had the same issue with patients with prior cesarean refusing transport to another facility for a trial of labor and refusing repeat cesarean. 

This protocol is not a "breech induction" protocol, nor is it meant to encourage patients to have a vaginal breech delivery.


*************************************************************************

Charlie = Chambers

Hood River, OR

cchamber@alumni.rice.edu



"No matter where you go...

   there you are."

Dr. Buckaroo Banzai

************************************************************************


On May 24, 2009, at 8:54 = AM, JD Stewart,MD wrote:

At Sat, 23 May 2009, Charlie Chambers wrote:


Maybe this is the place for the breech induction protocol!

Really? Was that necessary?


I apologize for the exclamation point, but there is a ring of truth, as
there would be for an IUFD breech induction...in a VBAC or otherwise.

Aside from the monitoring aspect, the presence of another "Breech
Induction" protocol at your hospital would come up as a local Standard
of Care...and this baby wouldn't fit.

Awful/Simply Awful scenario- lost/damaged million dollar bill
baby/missed ultrasound/ trouble in labor/ 4th degree/ hemorrhage/
hysterectomy/ blood transfusion/ hepatitis...DVT/stroke./ billion dollar
career in a wheelchair...

and the patient recalls she wanted an amnio but was talked out of it,
and begged you to do her C/S 2 days earlier...

Which brings us WAY around to the wisdom in the Breech Protocol staying
forever in committee...

--
JD Stewart, MD
MFM up all night, every night    
10 years later..

--Boundary_(ID_fuyLJa4daNpu607HePm3wQ)--




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:13:52 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.