-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Viewpoints appreciated From: GORDON M. GOLDMAN (obgyndoc@swbell.net) Sat May 23 13:55:59 2009 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Ginny Lee: "Re: Interesting Case" Previous message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Viewpoints appreciated" Joanne,   Glad to have you aboard the USS Paranoia.    Hank, have you been referred to the ACOG patient information pamphlet?  See the inset about 'keepsake ultrasounds'.   (http://www.acog.org/publications/patient_education/bp025.cfm )   Left unsaid is the inference that if there is an adverse outcome, you may be tangentially dragged into litigation for not infoming patient of the ACOG position.  As a rule, we do not advertise in our office for any procedure we do not do ourselves or have control over.    Gordon --- On Sat, 5/23/09, Joanne Bulley, MD <islesannie@gmail.com> wrote: From: Joanne Bulley, MD <islesannie@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Viewpoints appreciated To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 1:33 PM Hank, I agree with Steve.  We have a place like this in town.  They are spending big bucks on their own advertising - they don't need me to promote it. I would *guess* that the slippery slope includes - you put a pamphlet out - the for-profit-just-for-fun-baby-album place MISSES a major anomaly or some such and YOU now have the bigger pockets and YOU *should* have known whether they were really qualified and so forth. Paranoid ...  but I guess it isn't paranoid when they really ARE out to get you! Joanne At Fri, 22 May 2009, Raymond, Steve wrote: > >As far as I am concerned, investigations done which are not going to >change management are nothing to do with doctors, and should not be >offered by them, or their practices.  I would be against it. > >Steve Raymond >Ph (03)62227898 >Cell 0438372395 > >________________________________ > >________________________________ >From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Henry > >-- >________________________________ >Gregor >________________________________ >Sent: Friday, 22 May 2009 3:10 PM >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L >Subject: Viewpoints appeciated > >    I am interested in current thoughts on ob sono's done without >medical indication or MD order for social "family album" pictures with >3D units, for out of pocket cash paid by patients. > >    Admin staffers wish to place advertising brochures at patient >check out windows offering this service...my medical concern is re the >medical ethics of seeming to condone the service, and - by the brochure >placements - subliminally bringing MD endorsement or solicitation >pressures on the patients who see the brochures. The service is not part >of my (hospital based/physician employee) practice, but in another >facility owned by the hospital. From my read of a recent NC medical >board statement re physician practice sales and promotions of services >and goods, this is at least on the slippery slope of what could/should >be offered in a medical office. I know I can (and shall) solicit further >guidance from the State Board, but listers' comments would be welcome, >and perhaps best done off line. > >    Thanks > >    Hank > >CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER > >The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose. > -- Joanne Bulley, MD solo gyn Keene, NH Final mock-up or toile for my daughter's wedding dress finished this AM Sent off to her to try on and make changes before I cut the silk. Next message: Ginny Lee: "Re: Interesting Case" Previous message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Viewpoints appreciated"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:14:36 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.