-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: induction of breech at term From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirezt@coqui.net) Wed May 20 21:00:15 2009 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: induction of breech at term" Previous message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: induction of breech at term" In reply to: Charlie Chambers: "induction of breech at term" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: induction of breech at term" I saw most of the responses.. agree with most of them... most be out of your mnd to even "try" this protocol. Ef At Tue, 19 May 2009, Charlie Chambers wrote: > >--Boundary_(ID_UX491lpvERxMzeiIJhh8pA) >Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes >Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > >Wanted to poll the group's opinion about allowing induction of breech >at term for medical indications. We are currently working on a >protocol and there has been some difference of opinion. I've done a >literature search and cannot find any adverse outcomes associated with >induction, however, it seems that a number of trials excluded those >patients from data analysis. As long as the progress of labor is >closely monitored, I cannot see that inductions should be prohibited >for vaginal breech delivery. What does everyone else think? > >Thanks. > >****************************************************************************** >Charlie Chambers >Hood River, OR USA > >-- >cchamber@alumni.rice.edu > >"All good things...come by grace, >and grace comes by art, >and art does not come easy." > >Norman Maclean >******************************************************************************* > >--Boundary_(ID_UX491lpvERxMzeiIJhh8pA) >Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII >Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable > >Wanted to poll the group's opinion about allowing induction of breech at term for medical indications. We are currently working on a protocol and there has been some difference of opinion. I've done a literature search and cannot find any adverse outcomes associated with induction, however, it seems that a number of trials excluded those patients from data analysis. As long as the progress of labor is closely monitored, I cannot see that inductions should be prohibited for vaginal breech delivery. What does everyone else think? Thanks.  ****************************************************************************** <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px >0.0px"><font face=3D"Helvetica" size=3D"4" style=3D"font: 14.0px = > >Helvetica">Charlie Chambers                      Hood River, OR  USA cchamber@alumni.rice.edu   "All good things...come by grace,  and grace comes by art, and art does not come easy."                                         Norman Maclean ******************************************************************************* > >--Boundary_(ID_UX491lpvERxMzeiIJhh8pA)-- > -- "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans."- John Lennon Next message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: induction of breech at term" Previous message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: induction of breech at term" In reply to: Charlie Chambers: "induction of breech at term" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: induction of breech at term"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:13:52 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.