|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Term IUDFrom: Jayanakar (cjayankar@googlemail.com)Thu Mar 19 01:53:03 2009
--000e0cd2972246cc0f0465741673 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Then thrombophilias is the first option,cord accidents are rare,could also have been minor chromosomal abnormalities. I suppose her blood pressure was normal at the time of admission. Regards Jayankar On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, shilpa mangal <mangalshilpa@yahoo.co.in>wrote:
> period of geatation was 39 week plus 3 days,dates corresponds with 1 st --000e0cd2972246cc0f0465741673 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div>Hello</div> <div> </div> <div>Then thrombophilias is the first option,cord accidents are rare,could also have been minor chromosomal abnormalities.</div> <div> </div> <div>I suppose her blood pressure was normal at the time of admission.</div> <div> </div> <div>Regards</div> <div> </div> <div>Jayankar</div> <div> </div> <div><br><br> </div> <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, shilpa mangal <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mangalshilpa@yahoo.co.in">mangalshilpa@yahoo.co.in</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"> <div> <div style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"> <div>period of geatation was 39 week plus 3 days,dates corresponds with 1 st USG at 8 weeks.<br></div> <div>Regards</div> <div>shilpa</div> <div style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><br> <div style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</span></b> Jayanakar <<a href="mailto:cjayankar@googlemail.com" target="_blank">cjayankar@googlemail.com</a>><br><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</span></b> Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <<a href="mailto:ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net" target="_blank">ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net</a>><br> <b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, 18 March, 2009 3:39:17 PM<br><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</span></b> Re: Term IUD<br></font><br> <div>hello </div> <div> </div> <div>what about her dating,was it correct coz the baby weighed 3.4kg which is pretty big for</div> <div>indian babies at 37 weeks.</div> <div> </div> <div>regards</div> <div>jayacy</div> <div> </div> <div><br><br> </div> <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Dr.Shilpa Mangal <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mangalshilpa@yahoo.co.in" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">mangalshilpa@yahoo.co.in</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">hi,<br>I am a MD gynec,working in tertiary care centre in India.I have a<br>patient 26 yo,G1,no high risk factor,Rh +,sugars normal,BP at 37 week in<br> range of 120-130/90,never crossed 90 mm hg No history of smoking /drug<br>abuse. .All scans normal,no IUGR.Creatinine,uric acid normal,came to me<br>with loss of fetal move for 1 day at 39 weeks ,USG showed IUD spalding<br> sign negative , liquor slightly reduced,AFI 7.5.(patient did not came<br>for checkups after 35 weeks)<br><br>liver,kidney functions ,coagulation studies done before induction all<br>with in normal limits.<br>patient was induced,delivered male baby of 3.4 kg,single loop of cord<br> present around neck,placenta sent for pathological examination report<br>awaited.<br><br>my question is<br>what could be the probable cause?<br>what investigations should be done?<br><br>Thanks<br><font color="#888888">Dr.Shilpa Mangal<br> MD<br><br></font></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div><br> <hr size="1"> Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. <a href="http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_2/*http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/" target="_blank">Get it now</a></div></blockquote></div><br> --000e0cd2972246cc0f0465741673--
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:13:30 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.