|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean deliveryFrom: Charles Bloom (cdsb@bellsouth.net)Sun Sep 7 07:10:23 2008
I routinely score the uterus transversely with scalpel and then bluntly expand my Cesarean incisions transversely. I never thought about going vertically. I suspect I would end up with the same result, only with more difficultly. Charles _____ From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Raymond Stephen Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 3:59 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery And furthermore, there was no difference in the incidence of blood transfusion, nor any difference in the blood loss, so how can they say it contributes to losses of >1500ml? Steve _____ From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of DoctorJoe@aol.com Sent: Sunday, 7 September 2008 4:08 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery In a message dated 9/7/08 12:25:46 AM, sanbonav@hotmail.com writes: What is Your opinion,technique and experience about this argument?. I never saw a problem with the transverse blunt/finger dissection. I'd have to see the whole article and the explanation for the increased blood loss. Joe P. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Mar 2 05:13:20 2010 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.