Re: Ob: Cornual Ectopic

From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. (garrys@mindspring.com)
Thu Aug 28 20:37:02 2008


Dear all:

Great comments, and I did actually consider how to do her hysterectomy.

The MFM was certain of the location, so no more imaging was deemed necessary.

I saw her on Tuesday at 5 PM, and due to logistics, surgery was planned for Thursday AM.

On Wednesday at 1 PM, in preop, she had a syncopal episode without pain and was taken to the ER where she had a benign exam per the ER MD and a stable hematocrit. Surgery was thus moved up to 5 PM Wednesday.

My thinking as of Tuesday PM when scheduling it:

I had a vaginal hysterectomy in residency on a woman with a chronic ectopic (this was before widespead HCG levels were available) and remember how bad it was. While she would have been a great candidate if not pregnant, I didn't feel like doing this where you couldn't see her pelvis.

So, if you need visualization for a TVH candidate, and LAVH would work? Well, I was a bit reluctant to find out how each cautery line/pedicle would act, given the increased vascularity.

Thus, I did a TAH, and she indeed had an unruptured cornual ectopic on the side that she had the S and O. There was around 100 ml. of old blood in the pelvis, and the pedicles on that side (back bleeders) were quite vascular.

Garry

Joe--genetic work up? I saw her for the first time Tuesday PM, as one of my partners (out of town) had seen her last week, so I didn't delve into that at all.

At Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Atkinson, Samuel M, Jr wrote: >
>I published a paper in So Med Journal Feb 1974 entitled "Vaginal
>Hysterectomy: The Ideal Abortion in Multiparous Patients " VOL 67 (2) p
>134-137. It was preceded by a favorable commentary on page 132.
>In summary, the pregnant uterus is easier to remove than the non
>pregnant one as the tissues are softer and more malleable. Of course,
>this was in the dark ages(Pre laparoscope)! I suspect that laparoscopic
>may be bloodier with the use of clips, cautery or harmonics on a
>pregnant uterus. Of course, you can't empty the corneal pregnancy as
>you can the normal Intrauterine one .
>sAm
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>rmodugno@aol.com
>Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:09 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: Ob: Cornual Ectopic
>
>LAVH
>
>Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
>Sylva, NC
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. <garrys@mindspring.com>
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net>
>Sent: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 6:09 pm
>Subject: Ob: Cornual Ectopic
>
>43 YO P2022, relatively new patient to the practice, seen by partners
>but due to vacation, office rotation, comes to my attention. She and
>her husband seem reasonable and quite intelligent.
>
>2 term SVDs, children 3 and 6, both severly autistic (her words), and
>two spontaneous first trimester losses.
>
>HCG yesterday 17K, and ultrasound today with MFM is suggestive if not
>diagnostic of a cornual pregnancy.
>
>She has had a laparotomy for a unilateral S and O at age 16 ("large
>cyst") and a subsequent laparoscopy years ago for adhesions.
>
>Methotrexate offered and declined due to toxic chemicals, long term
>effects, etc. Clearly, the two autistic children weigh into decision
>making in terms of exposure to "stuff."
>
>Her exam is benign, 8 week size non-tender uterus. She is thin and has
>a low transverse skin incision.
>
>She requests hysterectomy.
>
>What say you?
>
>If you do it, how?
>
>Garry
>
>--
>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>Private Practice
>Roswell, GA
>

--
Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
Private Practice
Roswell, GA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:12:25 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.