-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology From: kamala nag (kamainvent@yahoo.com) Thu Aug 28 13:50:02 2008 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: kamala nag: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology" Previous message: kamala nag: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology" In reply to: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology" Next in thread: Charlie Chambers: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology" Reply: Charlie Chambers: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology" I would appreciate your scientific comments.  Thank you. --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Bernard Cristalli <bcrist@club-internet.fr> wrote: From: Bernard Cristalli <bcrist@club-internet.fr> Subject: Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 9:50 PM What is this crap mail? B kamala Mokha-Nag a écrit : > Hello, > > I am inviting the world audience to participate in open discussion on > the serious scientific and ethical issue presented on website > http://www.geneticpeace.com The issue is about the errorful medical teaching > and practice all over the world. Nobody has authority to rectify the > error being continued for 150 years, that is although wrongful, it is > legal and implement new advanced knowledge with all credibility. Thank > you. > > Kamala Mokha-Nag M.D. > P.O.Box 190893 > San Francisco, CA 94119 > Phone : 415-933-5771 > Next message: kamala nag: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology" Previous message: kamala nag: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology" In reply to: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology" Next in thread: Charlie Chambers: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology" Reply: Charlie Chambers: "Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:11:59 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.