|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic GynecologyFrom: Raymond Stephen (Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au)Wed Aug 27 20:21:04 2008
My response to this is: 1. Where is the evidence that this catheter improves outcomes? Have you any comparative studies to show an improvement in "take home baby" rates over other techniques. 2. Why do you presume that no-one can re-interpret a two dimensional drawing into three dimensions especially after years of residency and hours spent in operating on the female pelvis? The allegation that "errorful (sic) medical teaching" is a "serious scientific and ethical issue" is just laughable. If you have invented a new instrument, which you feel is an advance, then prove the advantages and present it seriously without the emotional and hysterical hype that the web site displays. Steve Raymond Ph (03)62227898 Cell 0438372395 -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of kamala Mokha-Nag Sent: Thursday, 28 August 2008 7:53 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology Hello, I am inviting the world audience to participate in open discussion on the serious scientific and ethical issue presented on website http://www.geneticpeace.com The issue is about the errorful medical teaching and practice all over the world. Nobody has authority to rectify the error being continued for 150 years, that is although wrongful, it is legal and implement new advanced knowledge with all credibility. Thank you. Kamala Mokha-Nag M.D. P.O.Box 190893 San Francisco, CA 94119 Phone : 415-933-5771 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:11:59 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.