-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Fwd: Incision type From: rmodugno@aol.com Thu Jul 31 17:42:46 2008 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Raymond Stephen: "Fri: Nederburg: was RE: Incision type" Previous message: verner nellsch: "Re: type of incision?" Next in thread: Raymond Stephen: "Fri: Nederburg: was RE: Incision type" Reply: Raymond Stephen: "Fri: Nederburg: was RE: Incision type" -----Original Message----- From: rmodugno@aol.com To: ob-gyn-@obgyn.net Sent: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 4:12 pm Subject: Incision type I debated about that, but it has been my experience recently that there are places where they have never heard of Trendelenburg, so I thought it wise to ensure clarity.  Sorry if I assumed too much Steve Raymond Ph (03)62227898 Cell 0438372395 -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Gerald P. Rodríguez Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2008 12:53 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Fw: type of incision? What is going on here?  We have someone, presumably intelligent, sending us ignorant peasants the definition of the Trendelenburg position.  Is this raw pedantry or what!? Gerald P. Rodríguez, M.D., FACOG Santa Fe ************************************************************************* *   Heck, I thought Trendelenburg was some kind of wine! No wait, that's Nederburg!  :+)   Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG Sylva, NC The Famous, the Infamous, the Lame - in your browser. Get the TMZ Toolbar Now! >From el@lisse.na Thu Jul 31 18:04:31 2008 Received: from ac.lisse.NA ([196.216.34.218]) by mail.obgyn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/dsb-1.1) with ESMTP id m6VN4Nc00309 for <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:04:25 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (epi [192.168.0.3]) by ac.lisse.NA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189671B547; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:04:21 +0100 (WAT) Cc: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> Message-Id: <3C497A6E-177F-474C-AE9F-5E1F9CF303C9@lisse.na> From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net In-Reply-To: <AF5BCC32628F465CAA50CB916DE322E9@docPC> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: type of incision? Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:04:20 +0100 References: <AF5BCC32628F465CAA50CB916DE322E9@docPC> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) At least I can spell my name right, Werner. el On 31 Jul 2008, at 23:06 , verner nellsch wrote: > i saw on your web site that your day job is gynecologist, your night > job is obstetrician. > > my life is similar. > > you might also want to check your parsing on your reply. dyslexia > might be catching, even across an ocean. vnellsch >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr Eberhard Lisse" <el@lisse.NA> > To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:49 AM > Subject: Re: type of incision? > >> 12:17 PM? Sleepless? >> >> And if you weren't running around in your old age, you'd probably >> also didn't have painful feet in the first place. >> >> el >> >> on 7/31/08 12:17 PM verner nellsch said the following: >> > eberhard, >> > >> > so good to hear from you. how are things? you seem a little, well, >> > tense. try what i do, just run laps. >> > >> > i buy the softest shoes i can, nikes or reeboks. my feet hurt, a >> > condition to which many old farts like you and me are >> subject.vnellsch > Next message: Raymond Stephen: "Fri: Nederburg: was RE: Incision type" Previous message: verner nellsch: "Re: type of incision?" Next in thread: Raymond Stephen: "Fri: Nederburg: was RE: Incision type" Reply: Raymond Stephen: "Fri: Nederburg: was RE: Incision type"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:12:00 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.