![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: English words (was Gen: Medical Records)From: Henry Gregor (henrygregor@yahoo.com)Tue Jun 24 18:31:55 2008
Wow, can't believe noone (h'mm..help me gang, would "nobody" be a better choice???) has highlighted the use and misuse of "healthful" and "healthy". :-) Hank --- On Mon, 6/23/08, Raymond Stephen <Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au> wrote: From: Raymond Stephen <Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au> Subject: English words (was Gen: Medical Records) To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> Date: Monday, June 23, 2008, 7:31 PM My current pet peeve is the use of "nauseous" to mean "nauseated" . The former means "bad enough to make you sick to your stomach"; the latter "feeling sick to your stomach". Another is "lay" instead of "lie"! Steve From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net on behalf of Charlie Chambers Sent: Tue 24/06/2008 2:59 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Gen: Medical Records Funny, how certain words and phrases become "pet peeves" for doctors. Here's the list of words/phrases from residency that was sure to attract attention. 1. Irregardless 2. Inflammable vs. flammable. 3. Bi-weekly 4. Incidental 5. Failed vs. unsuccessful 6. Fetal distress vs. Nonreassuring 7. Seized vs. convulsed. The list goes on. On Jun 23, 2008, at 9:52 AM, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 6/23/08 10:40:28 AM, rd.braun@gmail.com writes: As the dictionary says it is an ERRONEOUS word. an erroneous redundancy for regardless. http://www.iolani.honolulu.hi.us/Keables/KeablesGuide/PartThree/Letters/I.htm regardless; a combination of irrespective and regardless sometimes used humorously wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn Irregardless is a term that has caused controversy since it first appeared in the early twentieth century. It is generally listed in dictionaries as "non-standard". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless Sounds like fun to me. Joe P.
**************************************************************************** Charlie Chambers -- Hood River, OR cchamber@alumni.rice.edu
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:11:30 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.