Re: English words (was Gen: Medical Records)

From: Henry Gregor (henrygregor@yahoo.com)
Tue Jun 24 18:31:55 2008


Wow, can't believe noone (h'mm..help me gang, would "nobody" be a better choice???) has highlighted the use and misuse of "healthful" and "healthy".   :-)

Hank

--- On Mon, 6/23/08, Raymond Stephen <Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au> wrote:

From: Raymond Stephen <Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au> Subject: English words (was Gen: Medical Records) To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> Date: Monday, June 23, 2008, 7:31 PM

My current pet peeve is the use of "nauseous" to mean "nauseated" .  The former means "bad enough to make you sick to your stomach";  the latter "feeling sick to your stomach".  Another is "lay" instead of "lie"!   Steve

From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net on behalf of Charlie Chambers Sent: Tue 24/06/2008 2:59 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Gen: Medical Records

Funny, how certain words and phrases become "pet peeves" for doctors. Here's the list of words/phrases from residency that was sure to attract attention. 

1. Irregardless 2. Inflammable vs. flammable. 3. Bi-weekly 4. Incidental 5. Failed vs. unsuccessful 6. Fetal distress vs. Nonreassuring 7. Seized vs. convulsed. 

The list goes on. 

On Jun 23, 2008, at 9:52 AM, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 6/23/08 10:40:28 AM, rd.braun@gmail.com writes:

As the dictionary says it is an ERRONEOUS word.

     •     an erroneous redundancy for regardless. http://www.iolani.honolulu.hi.us/Keables/KeablesGuide/PartThree/Letters/I.htm      •     regardless; a combination of irrespective and regardless sometimes used humorously wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn      •     Irregardless is a term that has caused controversy since it first appeared in the early twentieth century. It is generally listed in dictionaries as "non-standard". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless

Sounds like fun to me.

Joe P.

**************************************************************************** Charlie Chambers

--
Hood River, OR
cchamber@alumni.rice.edu

"Almost anything you do will seem insignificant but it is very important that you do it....You must be the change you wish to see in the world"         -- Mahatma Ghandi. *******************************************************************************

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:11:30 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.