Re: Patient Arbitration Pacts Are Alarming Attorneys

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Sat Mar 29 14:57:55 2008


It appears that FL Ob-Gyns' stance has touched a nerve.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/30/magazine/30wwln-ethicist-t.html?ex=1364529600&en=aba70976751eaf27&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all

Art

At Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Dean Huffman . wrote: >
>,
>
>Patient Arbitration Pacts Are Alarming Attorneys
>
>The National Law Journal
>
>Binding arbitration agreements between doctors and patients -- in which patients
>waive their right to a jury trial -- are becoming more common, a trend that
>could put patients at a disadvantage if medical malpractice disputes surface,
>attorneys warn. A growing number of physicians, nursing homes and health care
>institutions are asking consumers to sign these agreements before offering
>services, says Stuart Ratzan of Miami's Ratzan & Rubio.
>
>http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1206614812624

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Fri May 2 04:50:09 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.