|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: peritoneumFrom: FRANCES WREN (fwren@shaw.ca)Thu Mar 6 21:23:27 2008
----bbaf7f0d372518e91b4f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit oh bother... conflicting stuff in different studies... to close or not close 2005 128 women..."to close is better" 2006 124 women..."to not close is better" what to do... maybe it doesn't matter. frances wren I shall keep looking...but interesting.
>----- Original Message -----
> Lyell DJ, et al. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery ----bbaf7f0d372518e91b4f Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<DIV>oh bother...</DIV>
<DIV>conflicting stuff in different studies...</DIV>
<DIV>to close or not close</DIV>
<DIV>2005 128 women..."to close is better"</DIV>
<DIV>2006 124 women..."to not close is better"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>what to do...</DIV>
<DIV>maybe it doesn't matter.</DIV>
<DIV>frances wren</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I shall keep looking...but interesting.<BR><BR>
>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: Ina May Gaskin <inamaygaskin@gmail.com><BR>Date: Thursday, March 6, 2008 6:23 pm<BR>Subject: Re: peritoneum<BR>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net><BR><BR>> Lyell DJ, et al. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery <BR>> and <BR>> adhesions Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:275-80.<BR>> <BR>> A prospective study of 173 cohort of women having first repeat c-<BR>> <BR>> section. Severity and location of adhesions were scored just <BR>> after <BR>> delivery. Records were then examined to assess prior <BR>> surgical <BR>> technique. A total of 128 women was required to have 80% power <BR>> to <BR>> detect a 505 reduction in adhesions when parietal peritoneum was <BR>> left <BR>> open.<BR>> <BR>> Conclusion: Parietal peritoneal closure at primary c-sec was 5-<BR>> fold <BR>> protective against all adhesions and 3-fold protective against <BR>> dense <BR>> adhesions. Omental-fascial adhesions were decreased most <BR>> consistently. "The practice of nonclosure of the parietal <BR>> peritoneum <BR>>& ----bbaf7f0d372518e91b4f--
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:59:13 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.