Re: Today was a GOOD day

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Sun Mar 2 08:19:45 2008


I'd say Mom and Baby got lucky. But then I'd rather be lucky than good.

Art

At Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: >
>The point is you got lucky,
>
>el
>
>On Mar 2, 2008, at 15:55, Meenan, Anna wrote:
>
>> As I said before, I was not around last Saturday, so I don't know
>> what transpired, but my guess is that the emergencies that postponed
>> the c-section happened sequentially, so that just about the time
>> they were ready to take her back, another occurred. Again, I was
>> not there.
>>
>> I did NOT let this patient push for an hour with deep variables, nor
>> would I let anyone do that. (The missing 34 minutes were spent
>> dilating from 9 to 10, getting nurse to chaperone for AROM,
>> performing AROM--I let the med student do it because it was such an
>> easy target-- and allowing patient to develop urge to push before
>> having her push.) She pushed for exactly 26 minutes. Heart tones
>> had excellent variability with small variable decels for the first
>> ten or 15 minutes, then got deeper. She had two contractions with
>> deep decels and I went out to tell the OB I was going to put on a
>> vacuum. She probably had one more while I was out of the room, and
>> 2 more after I returned, all with good return to baseline after the
>> contraction and good variability in between. (Didn't know anyone was
>> going to pick apart my management or I would have been more specific
>> about the EXACT sequence of events.) Do you race to c-section for
>> that? Just makes my point that I would not go to you for
>> obstetrical care.
>>
>> I don't see flaws in our system. You must work in a huge hospital
>> with unlimited empty OR's and bunches of scrub nurses and
>> anesthesiologists just sitting around twiddling their thumbs, even
>> on weekends. How nice for you. In the real world, there are plenty
>> of excellent hospitals doing excellent work with the resources they
>> have. BTW, my mother used to be a nurse surveyor for JCAHO and once
>> surveyed this hospital. She told me I was lucky to be working
>> there, because it was easily the best hospital she had ever
>> surveyed, of the hundreds all over the country that she had seen.
>>
>> It was a good day until I decided to tell my friends at OB-Gyn.net
>> about it. I'll keep my good days to myself in the future.
>>
>> Anna Meenan, MD, FAAFP
>>
>>> In a message dated 3/1/2008 8:44:44 PM Eastern Standard Time, annam@uic.edu
>>> writes:
>>>
>>> Yes, I think you must be a perfectionist, Allen, and I'm guessing
>>> most of your patients must be too. How sad for you. The patient
>>> and her mother (who is a very knowledgeable medical assistant, BTW)
>>> were ecstatic, and hugs were exchanged all around after the baby
>>> came. No one was unhappy. We all understand that the world is not
>>> perfect. Conditioning patients to expect perfection is what has
>>> gotten our profession into trouble in the first place. It is
>>> refreshing to care for patients who know that stuff happens and go
>>> with the flow.
>>>
>>> Anna Meenan, MD, FAAFP
>>>
>>> Anna, as I said before, I was not critical of your management of
>>> the case. I was just curious about your happy reaction. Why do
>>> you refuse to see flaws in your system? If your unit was so busy,
>>> why didn't you send her home right away instead of having her
>>> "waited and waited and waited" for a c/s? Complacency is an enemy
>>> for progress.
>>>
>>> And now since you are mean to me ... I am not sure I would let
>>> this patient push for an hour with deep variable decels. (Everybody
>>> got busy again, and when we checked her after 3 hours, she had gone
>>> from 1 to 9! Hooray! Broke her bag and got her started pushing.
>>> Deep variables with pushing..1 cm to baby in 4 hours.) I know it's
>>> unwise to argue with a good outcome, but I have heard of tragic
>>> ones under similar circumstances too. If you weren't so lucky,
>>> your good day could easily turn into a nightmare. Most patients
>>> can be very understanding when the outcome is good, she may not be
>>> so understanding if things had gone south.
>>>
>>> Again, I did not mean to offend you or rain on your parade.
>>>
>>> Allan
>>>
>>> >Watch the video on AOL Living.

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:59:13 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.