Re: Episiotomy question

From: Ina May Gaskin (inamaygaskin@gmail.com)
Tue Feb 19 08:52:24 2008


You can even feel the difference if you put one hand on your own symphysis and the other on your coccyx, noticing the distance between (you're standing). Lean back and then note what happens as you lean forward so your torso in parallel to the floor. You can feel the coccyx lift.

Ina May

On 18 Feb 2008, at 18:56, Raymond Stephen wrote:

> It can be shown that the outlet diameters change from the supine to
> the all fours position. That’s why the McRoberts is effective and
> the Gaskin even more so
>
> Steve
>
> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
> AllanHo@aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2008 1:34 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> Subject: Re: Episiotomy question
>
> In a message dated 2/18/2008 9:01:57 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> eramirezt@coqui.net writes:
> Allan the mechanisms of shoulder dystocia - IMHO - are not so clear in
> your mind.. the expulsive forces are not the critical factor in SD -
> the impingement of the shoulder behind the symphis - or the sacrum in
> the cases of the posterior shoulder is the problem.. if you give
> fundal
> pressure to an already stucked shoulder you will further increase
> damage
> - if you release the shoulder - by whatever maneuver you wish -
> then the
> expulsive forces will do the rest.. take care..
>
> Ef
> Dude (I mean sir), I am not proposing fundal pressure to deliver a
> stuck shoulder! I was asking Ina May why she thought gravity would
> help deliver a stuck baby when we know the expulsive force is not a
> factor. I am contending that it is the movements that unstick the
> shoulder, given that the outlet dimensions are the same when a
> woman is in the McRobert position and the on-all-4's position.
> Please read what I wrote carefully before you condemn what is in my
> mind. Thanks.
>
> Allan
>
> Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch the video on
> AOL Living.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
>
> The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or
> protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for
> the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such
> a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or
> dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have
> received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this
> office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to
> enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the
> transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted
> for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this
> transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is
> based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the
> addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above.
> Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other
> person or for any other purpose.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:12:35 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.