Re: Insurers Begin To Reimburse for Online Visits, Concerns Remain

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Feb 5 12:59:04 2008


The Downside of Virtual Medicine ...

Traditionally, the biggest obstacle to online consultation was the fact that insurance companies didn’t reimburse doctors for web-based work. But recently Aetna and Cigna, two of the nation’s biggest insurers, have agreed to reimburse doctors for online visits. Other big dogs in the insurance world are likely to follow suit soon.

With these changes, the anatomy of the web-doc industry is beginning to come into focus. For online consultation to be reimbursed by insurers, paperwork needs to be filled; for doctors to have a booming Internet practice, they need a strong online presence. To help with both of these matters, new companies have entered the fray, with cookie-cutter names like RelayHealth and Medem (“medicine” + “modem”; genius!).

... Right off the bat, it’s clear that the only physicians who will sign up for these online consultation services are those who can afford to shell out an extra $400 a year. This may not seem like that much, and doctors could make this money back by charging their patients for the service--particularly if they can charge whatever they want for an online consultation.

But this isn't true for doctors who serve low-income populations. For them, online consultation is a poor investment. 80 percent of all US households have at least one computer, but just 58 percent of those with annual household incomes under $30,000 have a computer at home. Take into account the fact that doctors who serve Medicaid patients are already subjected to alarmingly low reimbursement rates--and the fact that primary care salaries are on the decline—and you can see that doctors who serve the poor don't have the wiggle room to incur another sunk cost.

http://www.healthbeatblog.org/2008/02/the-downsides-o.html#more

Read the whole thing.

Art

At Tue, 5 Feb 2008, R. Daniel Braun wrote: >
>Not to mention that it is illegal in Indiana.
>
>On Feb 4, 2008 3:32 PM, <GIN11153@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Aetna and Cigna have recently begun reimbursing physicians for online
>> visits in the hope that the technology will increase access and boost
>> patient satisfaction. However, critics contend that online medical care
>> could create ethical concerns.
>>
>> http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-online4feb04,1,6324838.story?ctrack=2&cset=true
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.<http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002548>
>> ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> ------------------------------
>
>> ------------------------------
>--
>> ------------------------------
>R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG(L) CMT
>Professor Emeritus
>Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology
>Indiana U. School of Medicine
>
>R. Daniel Braun
>
> "Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND"
> Einstein 1941
>

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:49 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.