![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: BSO without hysterectomyFrom: Henry Gregor (henrygregor@yahoo.com)Sat Feb 2 20:19:45 2008
AllanHo@aol.com wrote: I have no strong objections to women who really want to have their uteri removed. This is more of an academic argument. How many women would have to be subjected to the additional risk of hysterectomy in order to avoid one case of interstitial Fallopian tube cancer? And doing a hysterectomy does not reduce the risk of primary peritoneal cancer. If there is ANY other indications for a hysterectomy, I would not hesitate to suggest one along with the risk reducing BSO. Otherwise, I would try to use the ACOG recommendation to reassure the patient that a hysterectomy would not be necessary. Allan Very reasonable outlook. --------------------------------- Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. ---------------------------------
-- ---------------------------------
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:49 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.