--
Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
_____
From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Douglas
Krell
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 3:41 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
Subject: Re: BSO without hysterectomy
I would normally give a 42 year old estrogen.
I'll probably do an LSH when her fibroids act up.
Douglas Krell
_____
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:29:02 -0600
From: rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com
To: ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net
Subject: Re: BSO without hysterectomy
What does it matter-these women are not going to get estrogen anyway. The
uterus will just atrophy unless they are morbidly obese, in that case the
length of the surgery becomes an increased variability for complications
Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
_____
From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Rafael
Haciski
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 2:07 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
Subject: Re: BSO without hysterectomy
But why not do a supracervical hyst at that point as well?
Just did one today for ovarian mass - the hysterectomy part took 20 min.
Rafael Haciski MD FACOG
Anchor Health Centers GYN
800 Goodlette Rd #360
239-643-8780 office
239-571-0292 cell
Naples, FL.
On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:30 PM, art fougner, md wrote:
I know many women in the NY area are having BSO's if they're BRCA
positive and are finished childbearing.
Art
At Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Douglas Krell wrote:
I saw a 42 yr old woman who had a laparoscopic bilateral oopherectomy for
ovarian cysts. They left a
"small fibroid uterus" behind. This is the second patient that I've seen
with her ovaries removed and a uterus
left in place. They both came from the NY area. Is this a common practice on
the east coast?Douglas Krell
--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
