Re: Gyn: Cervical Cancer Screening

From: ainsron (ainsron@sbcglobal.net)
Mon Jan 14 12:48:27 2008


I've always thought the opposite, LGSIL is usually high risk HPV, HGSIL is always high-risk HPV.

Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of FRANCES WREN Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:41 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Gyn: Cervical Cancer Screening

I thought that the majority of thr LSIL paps are lo risk HPV..

am I wrong.

I just usually follow them ...certainly in the younger women.the older ones I worry about and am more aggressive.

frances wren

>----- Original Message -----
From: evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md) Date: Saturday, January 12, 2008 11:57 am Subject: Re: Gyn: Cervical Cancer Screening To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>

> For your viewing pleasure, the ASSCP 2007 consensus guidelines
> may be
> seen here:
> http://nmanet.org/index.php?/video/index/your_practice_and_the_2007_accp
>
> Art
>
> At Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Larry Glazerman wrote:
> >
> >I think the argument here is one of cost-effectiveness. Since
> the ALTS
> >trial showed that >80% of LSIL paps will be HRHPV positive,
> it's more
> >cost effective to colpo all LSIL (to find the occasional cervix that
> >actually has a HSIL), than to do HRHPV on ALL LSILs, and then colpo
> >the 80% that are HRHPV positive.
> >
> >ASCUS is a different story. Since the prevalence of HRHPV in
> the ASCUS
> >population is much lower (I quote around 20%), then doing HRHPV
> on all
> >ascus makes sense - forget about the ones who are HRHPV
> negative, and
> >colpo the ones who are positive.
> >
> >Having said that, IF I were in the position that I knew I had a
> >patient with LSIL and negative HRHPV, I might not colpo her, as you
> >suggest.
> >
> >--
> >Larry R. Glazerman, MD, FACOG
> >St. Luke's Center for Advanced Gynecologic Care
> >250 Cetronia Road
> >Suite 305
> >Allentown PA 18104
> >484-223-3279
> >484-223-2830 FAX
> >glazerl@slhn.org
> >
> >On Jan 12, 2008, at 11:04 AM, <rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com>
> <rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com> > wrote:
> >
> >> and my thought is why do a colpo on ASCUS or LGSIL abscence
> of HR HPV?
> >>
> >> Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
> >> -sent from my Treo 650
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>
> >> From: Larry Glazerman <l.glazerman@rcn.com>
> >> Subj: Re: Gyn: Cervical Cancer Screening
> >> Date: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:06 pm
> >> Size: 1K
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-
> l@dns.obgyn.net>>>
> >> Yes, HPV 6 and 11 have been known to cause LGSIL, but
> virtually NEVER
> >> HGSIL. Therefore the LGSIL that might be caused by 6 and 11
> is even
> >> less concerning than that caused by 16-18 (which most of us
> wouldn't>> treat anyway.
> >>
> >> If I were a betting man, or lived in Las Vegas, I wouldn't do HRHPV
> >> testing on a LGSIL.
> >>
> >> Larry R. Glazerman, MD, FACOG
> >> St. Luke's Center for Advanced Gynecologic Care
> >> 250 Cetronia Road
> >> Suite 305
> >> Allentown PA 18104
> >> 484-223-3279
> >> 484-223-2830 FAX
> >> glazerl@slhn.org
> >>
> >> On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Richard Chudacoff wrote:
> >>
> >>> I never assume anything and it had kept me out of trouble do far.
> >>> Are you
> >>> telling me that a low risk HPV cannot cause LGSIL?
> >>>
> >>> Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On
> Behalf Of
> >>> Small,
> >>> Jennifer
> >>> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 10:15 AM
> >>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> >>> Subject: RE: Gyn: Cervical Cancer Screening
> >>>
> >>> LSIL in a woman over 21 assumes HR HPV. She should go
> to Colpo.
> >>> Probably will be CIN I and no treatment indicated, but...
> >>>
> >>> Jennifer Small, MSN,WHNP
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On
> Behalf Of
> >>> rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com
> >>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 7:36 PM
> >>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> >>
> >> --- message truncated ---
> >>
>
> --
> art fougner, md
> "May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:55:27 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.