Re: Gyn: Cervical Cancer Screening

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Sat Jan 12 12:56:50 2008


For your viewing pleasure, the ASSCP 2007 consensus guidelines may be seen here: http://nmanet.org/index.php?/video/index/your_practice_and_the_2007_accp

Art

At Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Larry Glazerman wrote: >
>I think the argument here is one of cost-effectiveness. Since the ALTS
>trial showed that >80% of LSIL paps will be HRHPV positive, it's more
>cost effective to colpo all LSIL (to find the occasional cervix that
>actually has a HSIL), than to do HRHPV on ALL LSILs, and then colpo
>the 80% that are HRHPV positive.
>
>ASCUS is a different story. Since the prevalence of HRHPV in the ASCUS
>population is much lower (I quote around 20%), then doing HRHPV on all
>ascus makes sense - forget about the ones who are HRHPV negative, and
>colpo the ones who are positive.
>
>Having said that, IF I were in the position that I knew I had a
>patient with LSIL and negative HRHPV, I might not colpo her, as you
>suggest.
>
>--
>Larry R. Glazerman, MD, FACOG
>St. Luke's Center for Advanced Gynecologic Care
>250 Cetronia Road
>Suite 305
>Allentown PA 18104
>484-223-3279
>484-223-2830 FAX
>glazerl@slhn.org
>
>On Jan 12, 2008, at 11:04 AM, <rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com> <rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com
> > wrote:
>
>> and my thought is why do a colpo on ASCUS or LGSIL abscence of HR HPV?
>>
>> Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
>> -sent from my Treo 650
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: Larry Glazerman <l.glazerman@rcn.com>
>> Subj: Re: Gyn: Cervical Cancer Screening
>> Date: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:06 pm
>> Size: 1K
>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>>
>> Yes, HPV 6 and 11 have been known to cause LGSIL, but virtually NEVER
>> HGSIL. Therefore the LGSIL that might be caused by 6 and 11 is even
>> less concerning than that caused by 16-18 (which most of us wouldn't
>> treat anyway.
>>
>> If I were a betting man, or lived in Las Vegas, I wouldn't do HRHPV
>> testing on a LGSIL.
>>
>> Larry R. Glazerman, MD, FACOG
>> St. Luke's Center for Advanced Gynecologic Care
>> 250 Cetronia Road
>> Suite 305
>> Allentown PA 18104
>> 484-223-3279
>> 484-223-2830 FAX
>> glazerl@slhn.org
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Richard Chudacoff wrote:
>>
>>> I never assume anything and it had kept me out of trouble do far.
>>> Are you
>>> telling me that a low risk HPV cannot cause LGSIL?
>>>
>>> Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>>> Small,
>>> Jennifer
>>> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 10:15 AM
>>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>> Subject: RE: Gyn: Cervical Cancer Screening
>>>
>>> LSIL in a woman over 21 assumes HR HPV. She should go to Colpo.
>>> Probably will be CIN I and no treatment indicated, but...
>>>
>>> Jennifer Small, MSN,WHNP
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>>> rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 7:36 PM
>>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>
>> --- message truncated ---
>>

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:55:27 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.