-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Gyn: POP-Q From: R. Daniel Braun (rd.braun@gmail.com) Thu Jan 10 08:02:30 2008 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: ainsron: "Re: Coding in general" Previous message: l.glazerman@rcn.com: "Re: GYN: FDA Says A Hormone Is A Hormone" In reply to: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Gyn: POP-Q" Next in thread: l.glazerman@rcn.com: "Re: Gyn: POP-Q" Yeah and all it is is the COMPLIFICATION of the Baden-Walker vaginal profile. *Baden* WF, *Walker* TA, Lindsey JH. The *vaginal profile*. Tex Med 1968;64:56-8. They made the mistake of presenting it at the Texas Medical Association meeting which in turn required it to be printed in Texas Medicine. Dan On Jan 9, 2008 11:16 PM, Joanne Bulley, MD <islesannie@gmail.com> wrote: > At a realtively recent (past 18 months) meeting of the NEOGS (NEw > England ObGyn Society) - the head of the urogyne program at Dartmouth > mentioned that most general practice folks don't need to adopt this - > but is great for those in academia - especially when they are comparing > outcomes and what surgery was done for which defect etc. > > Joanne > > At Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. wrote: > > > >Not likely, but I wanted to standardize my exams, as that was the intent > >of the POP-Q (and other systems) I think. > > > >Garry > > > >At Wed, 09 Jan 2008, Joe Cutchin wrote: > >> > >>Just a thought. Would you base the need for surgery on this assessment? > >>Joe C > >> > >>Garry E. Siegel, M.D. wrote: > >> > >>> Dear Listers: > >>> > >>> Do any of you use the POP-Q system in the office to assess patients? > >>> > >>> If so, what type of measuring device do you use, i.e. plastic ruler, > >>> graduated procto swab, other? > >>> > >>> Do you have a form or chart on which to record the results? > >>> > >>> I have not used this system (I'm a bit late in adopting it) but would > >>> like to do so when needed, and while I can create the things that I > >>> need, I bet that the wheel has already been invented. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Garry > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Garry E. Siegel, M.D. > >>> Private Practice > >>> Roswell, GA > >>> > >-- > >Garry E. Siegel, M.D. > >Private Practice > >Roswell, GA > > > > -- > Joanne Bulley, MD, FACOG > Solo gyn > Keene, NH USA > -- R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG(L) CMT Professor Emeritus Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology Indiana U. School of Medicine R. Daniel Braun "Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND" Einstein 1941 Next message: ainsron: "Re: Coding in general" Previous message: l.glazerman@rcn.com: "Re: GYN: FDA Says A Hormone Is A Hormone" In reply to: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Gyn: POP-Q" Next in thread: l.glazerman@rcn.com: "Re: Gyn: POP-Q"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:55:27 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.