Re: active tracing with decell

From: Henry Gregor (henrygregor@yahoo.com)
Wed Dec 19 09:29:22 2007


Well said, Ron. Louanna, I don't know how it goes with your patients. Ones I've seen over several thousand deliveries generally accept and acknowledge birth is a natural event with some occasional adverse events...I just haven't seen too many - either mine, or colleagues - who are that accepting of natural events, ex post facto a bad outcome that could have, maybe, just might have, possibly, been preventable by some intervention, even if that intervention led to some difficult neonatal circumstances. That said, the operant process here, is, I believe, an informed patient who is the major player in consenting to management processes...all documented in spades, of course. I think most patients go to obstetricians seeking care to enhance the potential for good outcomes, and minimize the potential for bad outcomes, even if those bad outcomes are low in potential occurence, so it is incumbent upon us to provide realistic assessments. (In fact, even if our counseling the patients leads to concerns by other providers that we might just be a bunch of curmudgeons casting every pregnancy as a disaster waiting to happen.)......Otherwise, they could deliver babies in a relaxed atmosphere at home, as my grandmothers did with nine children....though their choices were dictated by circumstance, not by their individual volition.

:-)

Hank

ainsron <ainsron@sbcglobal.net> wrote: “You pays your money and you takes your chances.” Personally, if I have any doubt, I would rather have a sick, stable premie in the nursery than a potentially dead baby in the womb and most patients I take care of would rather have the same.

Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of westsidebirthservice@juno.com Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 6:50 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: active tracing with decell

Could be true knot that isn't fatal. Your'e going to deliver "just in case?" Just wondering where the dividing line is between the "every birth is a disaster waiting to happen and can't be diagnosed as normal until after the event" and "birth is a natural event with some fatal outcomes due to (someties cord) accidents." And what of the sequela of delivering a preterm baby because of the fear of a fatal cord accident? Louana

-- Joe <forcep@intercom.net> wrote: Excellent point, Dan. Could have true knot which could be fatal. Joe C

R. Daniel Braun wrote: > That makes no sense at all. If you have cord entanglement theoretically
> it could at any time become so severe that it kills the baby. So
> logically you have to either monitor her continuously until delivery or
> ignore it. NST's and CST's don't predict anything about cord problems,
> only about UPI. Therefore they are of no benefit.
>
> IMHO
> Dan
>
> On Dec 18, 2007 8:05 PM, Raymond Stephen
> <Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au
> <mailto:Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au>> wrote:
>
> And, you're going to mess up her sugars. Ask yourself shy she had the
> deceleration - can't be placental insufficiency, no IUGR, so it has to
> be an intermittent cord compression,? entanglement, probably won't
> happen again, why not just check CTG regularly?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net <mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>
> [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net <mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>] On Behalf Of
> Richard Chudacoff
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2007 11:51 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> Subject: RE: active tracing with decell
>
> That is true, especially in this case with GDM. But hey, that is why I
> don't
> deliver anymore
>
> Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net <mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>
> [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net <mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>] On Behalf Of Dr.
> John
> Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 4:42 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> Subject: Re: active tracing with decell
>
> At Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Richard Chudacoff wrote:
> >
> >Steroids in the 34th week? Isn't that too late?
> >
> >--
> >Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
> >
> 34 wks is on the border for celestone, the problem with 34 wk delievery
> is chance of resp support for a few days is significant. Would I fault
> anyone for delievery, no, especially if that's what the mom wants after
> explaining the risks.
>
> --
> Take care, John
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
>
> The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or
> protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for
> the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a
> person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination
> of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the
> transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by
> telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable
> arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or
> its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any
> unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.
> If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on
> instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in
> connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not
> accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other
> purpose.
>
> --
> R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG(L) CMT
> Professor Emeritus
> Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology
> Indiana U. School of Medicine
>
> R. Daniel Braun
>
> "Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND"
> Einstein 1941





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:58:26 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.