OB-GYN-L Messages for November, 2007: Re: 2am roundtable discussions

Re: 2am roundtable discussions
From: FRANCES WREN (fwren@shaw.ca)
Mon Nov 19 16:05:31 2007

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Zachariah Newton: "Re: Product Liability Case To Be Heard Soon"
Previous message: Lauri Romanzi, MD: "Re: Gyn: Colpexin"
In reply to: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: 2am roundtable discussions"
Next in thread: Henry Gregor: "Re: Gyn: Colpexin"
Reply: Henry Gregor: "Re: Gyn: Colpexin"

----1b44b2308dac91fd64e07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
i don't do a vag exam after C/S...and I too do not think it is necessary...also although I used to express the uterus after C/S I rarely do that now either... frances wren

>----- Original Message -----
From: eramirezt@coqui.net (Efrain Ramirez) Date: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:03 am Subject: Re: 2am roundtable discussions To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
> I havent' found an article regarding vaginal exam after C/S -
> but I
> think it's unnecessary --
>
> Ef
>
> At Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> >
> >Exactly.
> >
> >And, "good inspection", hmmm...
> >
> >Though I do like to express the uterus, this is probably only
> because of
> >the way I was trained, I'd love to see some evidence about it :-
> )-O
> >
> >el
> >
> >on 11/19/07 2:30 PM Ina May Gaskin said the following:
> >> Wouldn't it be simpler just to give the placenta and
> membranes a good
> >> inspection?
> >>
> >> Ina May
> >>
> >> On 19 Nov 2007, at 02:03, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> >>
> >>> Allan,
> >>>
> >>> With all due respect, before Semmelweis all our colleagues were
> >>> enjoying their good results too...
> >>>
> >>> Is there some evidence that a vaginal digital manipulation
> post C/S
> >>> is safe?
> >>>
> >>> And, while we are at it, is there evidence that we should express
> >>> clots from the uterus at all?
> >>>
> >>> el
>
> --
> "I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." - Michael
> Jordan

----1b44b2308dac91fd64e07 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<DIV>i don't do a vag exam after C/S...and I too do not think it is necessary...also although I used to express the uterus after C/S I rarely do that now either...</DIV>
><DIV>frances wren ----- Original Message ----- From: eramirezt@coqui.net (Efrain Ramirez) Date: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:03 am Subject: Re: 2am roundtable discussions To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> > I havent' found an article regarding vaginal exam after C/S - > but I > think it's unnecessary -- > > Ef > > At Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: > > > >Exactly. > > > >And, "good inspection", hmmm... > > > >Though I do like to express the uterus, this is probably only > because of > >the way I was trained, I'd love to see some evidence about it :- > )-O > > > >el > > > >on 11/19/07 2:30 PM Ina May Gaskin said the following: > >> Wouldn't it be simpler just to give the placenta and > membranes a good > >> inspection? > >> > >> Ina May<BR&#
062;> >> > >> On 19 Nov 2007, at 02:03, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: > >> > >>> Allan, > >>> > >>> With all due respect, before Semmelweis all our colleagues were > >>> enjoying their good results too... > >>> > >>> Is there some evidence that a vaginal digital manipulation > post C/S > >>> is safe? > >>> > >>> And, while we are at it, is there evidence that we should express > >>> clots from the uterus at all? > >>> > >>> el > > -- > "I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." - Michael > Jordan</DIV>
----1b44b2308dac91fd64e07--

Next message: Zachariah Newton: "Re: Product Liability Case To Be Heard Soon"
Previous message: Lauri Romanzi, MD: "Re: Gyn: Colpexin"
In reply to: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: 2am roundtable discussions"
Next in thread: Henry Gregor: "Re: Gyn: Colpexin"
Reply: Henry Gregor: "Re: Gyn: Colpexin"

Return to Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:03 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.

use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: