Re: Fetal demise 31 wks aburption.

From: FRANCES WREN (fwren@shaw.ca)
Sat Nov 17 10:33:09 2007


----286179cb81c9738ed6769 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I don't think the gel works as well as cytotec...however i admit it is usually the gel that i use. frances wren

>----- Original Message -----
From: eramirezt@coqui.net (Efrain Ramirez) Date: Friday, November 16, 2007 6:24 pm Subject: Re: Fetal demise 31 wks aburption. To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>

> Why use Cytotec if you can use PG2 in gel?
>
> Ef
>
> At Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc.
> M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.
> wrote:
> >
> >At Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc.
> M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.
> >wrote:
> >>
> >1: Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):352-6. Links
> >Misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination in women
> with a
> >prior cesarean delivery.Dickinson JE.
> >School of Women's and Infants' Health, The University of Western
> >Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, 374 Bagot Road,
> >Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia 6008, Australia.
> >jand@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
> >
> >OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of misoprostol in second-trimester
> >abortion in women with prior cesarean deliveries.
> METHODS: A review of
> >women with prior cesarean deliveries undergoing abortion at 14-
> 28 weeks
> >of gestation for a fetal anomaly over a 7.5-year period.
> Outcome data
> >were compared with a contemporaneous cohort of women with unscarred
> >uteri undergoing the same procedure. Misoprostol was used
> to induce
> >abortion in all cases, and a variety of dosage regimens were
> used, the
> >most frequent being 400 mug vaginally every 6 hours
> (71.3%). RESULTS:
> >During the study period, 720 consecutive women underwent a
> >second-trimester abortion for a fetal anomaly using
> misoprostol. One
> >hundred one women (14%) had at least 1 prior cesarean delivery:
> 78 women
> >had 1, 19 women had 2, and 4 women had 3 prior cesarean deliveries.
> >Women with a prior cesarean birth were significantly older (30 years
> >[interquartile range 26-35] versus 33 years [29-37], no cesarean
> >delivery versus cesarean delivery, P = < .001) and of
> increased parity.
> >The median gestational age at delivery was 19.4 weeks (interquartile
> >range 18-20.7) versus 19.3 weeks (17.7-21), no cesarean
> delivery versus
> >cesarean delivery, P = .48. The presence of a prior
> uterine scar did
> >not impact upon abortion duration (16.6 hours [12.1-23.8]
> versus 14.5
> >.07). No differences in blood loss, major hemorrhage, or blood
> >transfusion occurred. There was no case of uterine
> rupture or
> >hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: In second-trimester abortion,
> the use of
> >misoprostol in women with prior cesarean delivery was not associated
> >with an excess of complications compared with women with unscarred
> >uteri. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
> >
> >>--
> >> Take care, John
> >>
> >--
> > Take care, John
> >
>
> --
> "I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." - Michael
> Jordan

----286179cb81c9738ed6769 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<DIV>I don't think the gel works as well as cytotec...however i admit it is usually the gel that i use.</DIV>

><DIV>frances wren<BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: eramirezt@coqui.net (Efrain Ramirez)<BR>Date: Friday, November 16, 2007 6:24 pm<BR>Subject: Re: Fetal demise 31 wks aburption.<BR>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L &lt;ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net&gt;<BR><BR>&gt; Why use Cytotec if you can use PG2 in gel?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Ef<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; At Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Dr.&nbsp; John Provatopoulos B.Sc.&nbsp; <BR>&gt; M.D.C.M.&nbsp; F.R.S.C.<BR>&gt; wrote:<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;At Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Dr.&nbsp; John Provatopoulos B.Sc.&nbsp; <BR>&gt; M.D.C.M.&nbsp; F.R.S.C.<BR>&gt; &gt;wrote:<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;1: Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):352-6. Links<BR>&gt; &gt;Misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination in women <BR>&gt; with a<BR>&gt; &gt;prior cesarean delivery.Dickinson JE.<BR>&gt; &gt;School of Women's and Infants' Health, The University of Western<BR>&gt; &gt;Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, 374 Bagot Road,<BR>&gt; &gt;Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia 6008, Australia.
0;BR>&gt; &gt;jand@cyllene.uwa.edu.au<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of misoprostol in second-trimester<BR>&gt; &gt;abortion in women with prior cesarean deliveries.&nbsp; <BR>&gt; METHODS: A review of<BR>&gt; &gt;women with prior cesarean deliveries undergoing abortion at 14-<BR>&gt; 28 weeks<BR>&gt; &gt;of gestation for a fetal anomaly over a 7.5-year period.&nbsp; <BR>&gt; Outcome data<BR>&gt; &gt;were compared with a contemporaneous cohort of women with unscarred<BR>&gt; &gt;uteri undergoing the same procedure.&nbsp; Misoprostol was used <BR>&gt; to induce<BR>&gt; &gt;abortion in all cases, and a variety of dosage regimens were <BR>&gt; used, the<BR>&gt; &gt;most frequent being 400 mug vaginally every 6 hours <BR>&gt; (71.3%).&nbsp; RESULTS:<BR>&gt; &gt;During the study period, 720 consecutive women underwent a<BR>&gt; &gt;second-trimester abortion for a fetal anomaly using <BR>&gt; misoprostol.&nbsp; One<BR>&gt; &gt;hundred one women (14%) had at least 1 prior cesarean delivery: <BR>&gt; 78 women<BR>&gt; &gt;had 1, 19 women had 2, and 4 women had 3 prior cesarean deliveries.<BR>&gt; &gt;Women with a prior cesarean birth were significantly older (30 years<BR>&gt; ; &gt;[interquartile range 26-35] versus 33 years [29-37], no cesarean<BR>&gt; &gt;delivery versus cesarean delivery, P = &lt; .001) and of <BR>&gt; increased parity.<BR>&gt; &gt;The median gestational age at delivery was 19.4 weeks (interquartile<BR>&gt; &gt;range 18-20.7) versus 19.3 weeks (17.7-21), no cesarean <BR>&gt; delivery versus<BR>&gt; &gt;cesarean delivery, P = .48.&nbsp; The presence of a prior <BR>&gt; uterine scar did<BR>&gt; &gt;not impact upon abortion duration (16.6 hours [12.1-23.8] <BR>&gt; versus 14.5<BR>&gt; &gt;.07).&nbsp; No differences in blood loss, major hemorrhage, or blood<BR>&gt; &gt;transfusion occurred.&nbsp; There was no case of uterine <BR>&gt; rupture or<BR>&gt; &gt;hysterectomy.&nbsp; CONCLUSION: In second-trimester abortion, <BR>&gt; the use of<BR>&gt; &gt;misoprostol in women with prior cesarean delivery was not associated<BR>&gt; &gt;with an excess of complications compared with women with unscarred<BR>&gt; &gt;uteri.&nbsp; LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;--<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Take care, John<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;--<BR>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Take care, John<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; --<BR>&gt; "I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." - Michael <BR>&gt; Jordan</DIV>

----286179cb81c9738ed6769--





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:11:48 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.