-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Calif. Bar Board Members Butt Heads on Malpractice Insurance From: Joe (forcep@intercom.net) Thu Nov 15 05:07:03 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.: "Global View Shows Link Between Endometrial Cancer and Vitamin D Status" Previous message: Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD, JD: "Re: Input appreciated" In reply to: Gordon Goldman: "Re: Calif. Bar Board Members Butt Heads on Malpractice Insurance Disclosure" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Calif. Bar Board Members Butt Heads on Malpractice Insurance Disclosure" -- Joe P : When we all work for the Federal Government and come under the Fedreal Tort Law , will the American Justice Society support a candidate that proposes this? Seems ironic that trial lawyers support Dems but may cut their own throat. I think the Fox will catch fleas. Joe C Gordon Goldman wrote: > In Missouri, if you live in a county with greater than 75,000 > population, and want to have hospital privileges, you are mandate by > state statute to have a minimum $500,000/$1,000,000 professional > liability coverage to keep your license. So, if a dermatologist who > does not see hospital patients wishes, they need not have coverage, but > if they want hospital privileges, they must have coverage. Does not > make sense to me either, but that's the law. > > Gordon M. Goldman, M.D., FACOG > Private Practice, St. Louis, Mo. > > On Nov 14, 2007, at 6:16 PM, DoctorJoe@aol.com > <mailto:DoctorJoe@aol.com> wrote: > >> >> In a message dated 11/14/07 5:53:25 PM, rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com >> <mailto:rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com> writes: >> >>> It would be nice if we could get the same consideration as the >>> lawyers, but then again, we don’t get to make the laws, do we? >> >> Ahhh, but we DO have the same consideration. We're not legally >> required to have malpractice insurance, are we? In other words, >> there's no LAW that says we need malpractice. There's only (private) >> rules by, e.g., hospitals and 3rd party insurers. If a company or >> other entity required their in-house lawyers or contract lawyers to >> carry malpractice, it would be the same thing. >> >> Joe P. >> > Next message: Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.: "Global View Shows Link Between Endometrial Cancer and Vitamin D Status" Previous message: Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD, JD: "Re: Input appreciated" In reply to: Gordon Goldman: "Re: Calif. Bar Board Members Butt Heads on Malpractice Insurance Disclosure" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Calif. Bar Board Members Butt Heads on Malpractice Insurance Disclosure"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:03 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.