-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: ob us in office - question on training From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Wed Nov 14 11:27:09 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Here is one for y'all to consider - Joe, legaleeze this one" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Illinois' Malpractice Caps Likely To Go To State's High Court" In reply to: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: ob us in office - question on training" Next in thread: mark decker: "Re: ob us in office - ROI worth it? - machine choices?" Reply: mark decker: "Re: ob us in office - ROI worth it? - machine choices?" AIUM Guidelines - http://www.aium.org/publications/clinical/obstetric.pdf And those are for the Routine studies, NOT the targeted exams. As you can see, there are no more Level 1's. Art At Wed, 14 Nov 2007, R. Daniel Braun wrote: > >Read the AIUM and ACOG guidelines and follow them. Generate the reports for >each exam. There are lots of programs to do so. > >Dan > >On Nov 13, 2007 9:06 PM, mark decker <mhdmd@wi.rr.com> wrote: > >> I came out of residency in 88 - nearly 20 years ago now >> >> we did a detailed - old school level II training rotation - not >> aium's 300 cases - but a lot of level II scans >> and we did the full routine ob scan on a high number - over 300 i am >> sure - ob cases in 4 years - measurements - anatomy basics - position >> number - placenta - cervix- fluid and the like >> >> i am opening up a new practice and would like to have an us for >> limited scan purposes - specific questions >> >> bpps - position - fluid - growth - iugr question <not often this as >> f/u extensive scan would follow with definite concerns> - viability >> early on with spotting and no fhts - >> >> usual on L&D questions I would prefer to do in the office and save >> the trip to ob >> >> i have a lot of experience with these specific question scans in L&D >> over the years and in L&D the BPP was usually the main reason for the scan >> >> question is - if in office and i want to do the above how does my >> training in 84-88 and experience since hold up today re legitimacy in >> doing and "reading" results? >> >> i am not talking at this point in doing all my routine scans - i am >> talking about limited scans in todays world >> >> thanks in advance >> >-- >R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG(L) CMT >Professor Emeritus >Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Indiana U. School of Medicine > >R. Daniel Braun > > "Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND" > Einstein 1941 > -- art fougner, md "May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Here is one for y'all to consider - Joe, legaleeze this one" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Illinois' Malpractice Caps Likely To Go To State's High Court" In reply to: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: ob us in office - question on training" Next in thread: mark decker: "Re: ob us in office - ROI worth it? - machine choices?" Reply: mark decker: "Re: ob us in office - ROI worth it? - machine choices?"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:03 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.