Re: view Finds Routine Amniotomy of No Benefit

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Mon Nov 5 15:56:36 2007


Here's another headline ... I don't make 'em up. Just the messenger.

Amniotomy During Spontaneous Labor Benefits Neither Mother Nor Child http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/Pregnancy/tb/7010

Art

At Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Raymond Stephen wrote: >
>There is a difference between what Cochrane wrote - "...little evidence
>that a shorter labour has benefits..." and what you wrote - "Review
>Finds Routine Amniotomy of No Benefit".
>
>I beg your pardon.
>
>Steve
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of art
>fougner, md
>Sent: Tuesday, 6 November 2007 1:29 AM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: OB: Review Finds Routine Amniotomy of No Benefit
>
>>From Cochrane:
>
>The aim of breaking the waters (also known as artificial rupture of the
>membranes, ARM, or amniotomy), is to speed up and strengthen
>contractions, and thus shorten the length of labour. The membranes are
>punctured with a crochet-like long-handled hook during a vaginal
>examination, and the amniotic fluid floods out. Rupturing the membranes
>is thought to release chemicals and hormones that stimulate
>contractions. Amniotomy has been standard practice in recent years in
>many countries around the world. In some centres it is advocated and
>performed routinely in all women, and in many centres it is used for
>women whose labours have become prolonged. However, there is little
>evidence that a shorter labour has benefits for the mother or the baby.
>There are a number of potential important but rare risks associated with
>amniotomy, including problems with the umbilical cord or the baby's
>heart rate.
>
>http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab006167.html
>
>If it ain't broke, don't fix it?
>
>Art
>
>--
>art fougner, md
>"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
>
>The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose.
>

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:03 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.