-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted to Go Forward From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Thu Nov 1 06:03:44 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Gyn: Positive margins on a LEEP" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted to Go Forward" In reply to: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted to Go Forward" Next in thread: Joe Cutchin: "Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted" Reply: Joe Cutchin: "Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted" Dan Probably the case was taken on contingency - no money paid unless either settlement or judgement. Art At Thu, 1 Nov 2007, R. Daniel Braun wrote: > >What about taking money from a client for 3 years to represent them in a >case that has no merit??? > >On 11/1/07, DoctorJoe@aol.com <DoctorJoe@aol.com> wrote: >> >> In a message dated 10/31/07 5:09:06 PM, dean@thehuffpeople.net writes: >> >> A New York judge has permitted a legal malpractice suit to proceed against >> a >> group of personal injury lawyers who tried to argue that the medical >> malpractice suit they allegedly botched had no merit in the first place. >> >> That's basically the burden of proof in a legal malpractice case. You have >> to show the original case had merit. If they screwed up a case that had NO >> merit, then there's no malpractice. >> >> Joe P. >> >-- >R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG(L) CMT >Professor Emeritus >Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Indiana U. School of Medicine > >R. Daniel Braun > > "Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND" > Einstein 1941 > -- art fougner, md "May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton Next message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Gyn: Positive margins on a LEEP" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted to Go Forward" In reply to: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted to Go Forward" Next in thread: Joe Cutchin: "Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted" Reply: Joe Cutchin: "Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:03 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.