Re: Meaning of Unattached
From: Myer Bornstein (mborn@massmed.org)
Thu Sep 27 13:23:06 2007
I agree with Ron
Myer
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Ron
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:09 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> Subject: RE: Meaning of Unattached
>
> If the patient never returned for follow-up, I don't feel that a doctor
> patient relationship was ever established.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Efrain
> Ramirez
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:33 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> Subject: Re: Meaning of Unattached
>
> Myer, Ron and Joanne- same scenario but the first physician admitted the
> parient - but never came for follow-up.. what then?
>
> Ef
>
> >patientAt Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Myer Bornstein wrote:
> >
> >Man on call with no established doctor physician relationship made by
> >f/u and since the patient was seen as a consult from the ER. The
> >Physician doesn't have to take this person on as a patient Myer
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
> >> Efrain Ramirez
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:20 PM
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> >> Subject: Meaning of Unattached
> >>
> >> "Unattached" patient at ER seen by MD on call - no further contact -
> >> months later same patient goes to ER - asks for MD she saw at ER
> >> months ago.. now not on call.. he is contacted by phone - says he
> >> is not on call - and she is not his patient (no visits to his office)
>
> >> - who is responsible?
> >>
> >> Ef
> >>
> >> --
> >> " The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
> >> it is the illusion of knowledge." Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian
>
> --
> " The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
> it is the illusion of knowledge." Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian
|
|
