Re: Gyn: Hysterectomy; Is there more than one way to skin a cat?

From: R. Daniel Braun (rd.braun@gmail.com)
Fri Sep 21 15:41:50 2007


On 9/21/07, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. <garrys@mindspring.com> wrote: >
> Over the past few months, "how" to perform a hysterectomy has been on my
> mind, with several diverging options and opinions. This all may be
> based on personal preference, skill, equipment availablity, etc. We all
> agree that if you do an operation well, and if several operations meet
> the patient's needs, it is better to do the operation you do best. .

NO!! It is best to do the operation that the patients anatomy and pathology dictates. Different strokes for diferent folks .

That is why I tell(Oops, TOLD) the residents, that they can' learn just one way. They have to learn as many ways as possible, so that they will be ready for whatever comes at them.

.. >
> Anyway, for discussion, I would like to focus on the surgical options
> and techniques, and rationale, if any, behind what one does. This may
> bleed over into cervical retention versus removal, which, to a degree,
> may influence what is done and how it is done.
>
> 35 YO P3003, all vaginal deliveries, who has completed her family, with
> disabiling menorrhagia (normal CBC) and dysmenorrhea, who cannot/will
> not use hormonal contraception (hemiplegic migraines per her), and has a
> strong family history of endometriosis. Her exam, ultrasound, and CBC
> are normal. She requests a hysterectomy with ovarian retention.
>
> FWIW, she underwent a LAVH yesterday unremarkably, with a normal pelvis
> and pathology pending.
>
> So. . .
>
> What about Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH)? Laparoscopic
> Supracervical Hysterectomy (LSH)? Old-fashioned TVH? Did she need a
> laparoscopy? (I think so). If so, why not a diagnostic laparoscopy and
> then TVH?

PLAIN OLD VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY BY WHICHEVER TECHNIQUE WORKS BEST FOR HER. No Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive surgery is the LEAST invasive method and that is vaginal. NO Abdominal incision.

Dan

If you do a TLH, might you be "missing" the chance to support the > vaginal to the uterosacrals as one might do vaginally? Is it needed?
> McCalls?
>
> Might you avoid this with an LSH? But, if you do an LSH, might the stump
> contain suspected adenomyosis?
>
> All food for thought--discussion welcome.
>
> --
> Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
> Private Practice
> Roswell, GA
>

--
R. Daniel Braun, MD  FACOG(L)  CMT
Professor Emeritus
Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Indiana U. School of Medicine

R. Daniel Braun

"Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND" Einstein 1941





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:59:57 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.