Re: ASC-US

From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. (garrys@mindspring.com)
Sat Sep 1 20:54:57 2007


Agree--it is easier to just do it than argue about it. That said, if you get tired of arguing, I would not fault you for telling her "This isn't working out well" and please go to another physician.

Garry

At Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Rafael Haciski wrote: >
>Pick your battles wisely - this is not a hill worth dying on.
>
>I would have explained to her that it is not medically necessary, and
>if she persisted, told her that the insurance may not pay for it, and
>that she may have to foot the bill. That usually stops all but the
>most intense, and then I do it. It's a free country.
>
>And in reality it is not the time interval that is important but the
>repeat look at the cells - PAP smear has a high "miss" rate, and the
>repeat PAP is what reduces that "miss" rate. Whether it is done a 3
>months, or 4 months, or 6 is immaterial.
>
>I usually do follow up PAPs (for ASCUS, +HPV, L-SILs etc following
>colpo confirmation) q 3 months for a total of 4 - never had insurance
>problems.
>
>--
>Rafael Haciski MD FACOG
>Anchor Health Centers GYN
>800 Goodlette Rd #360
>239-643-8780 office
>239-571-0292 cell
>Naples, FL.
>
>On Sep 1, 2007, at 8:47 PM, R. Berg wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, today, I had just the reverse problem.
>>
>> 5/07 pap, ASCUS, HR HPV *negative*
>>
>> Pt comes in 3 months later, c/o vague pelvic pain x 2 weeks. Exam
>> completely unremarkable. She then asks for a repeat pap, based on the
>> letter I sent her, suggesting that her slightly abnormal pap,
>> although not
>> concerning for dysplasia, should be followed up in 6 months.
>>
>> I declined to perform one, suggesting to her that a repeat in *6*
>> months is
>> probably overdoing it.
>>
>> She left the office (this is 4 days ago). Today, she calls me,
>> *irate*, and
>> tells me that it is her "legal right" and that it is my "legal
>> obligation"
>> to perform a repeat pap smear; furthermore, since she has celiac
>> disease and
>> that this condition is associated with lymphoma, and that her
>> mother had an
>> ovary removed for a nonmalignant condition she *needs* a repeat pap
>> smear
>> now, given that it is only 3 months less than the time I suggested
>> for her
>> to repeat the smear (I guess it's not really a "smear" anymore,
>> more of a
>> "stir" or "swish." Pap Swish doesn't really sound as clinical, I
>> suppose).
>> Again, I declined. She then informed me that her only recourse
>> would be to
>> contact her insurance company to demand that I repeat it. I told
>> her that
>> she can do what she feels necessary, but that her insurance company
>> would
>> likely agree with me, and, in any event, no matter what they said,
>> I would
>> not be repeating the test, as I do not feel that it is medically
>> indicated.
>>
>> So should I have:
>>
>> 1) repeated the smear, coding 795.01, ASC-US on pap, just because
>> she wanted
>> one, or
>>
>> 2) repeated the smear, coding 300.02, generalized anxiety disorder
>> or 300.7,
>> hypochondriasis, or
>>
>> 3) stuck to (and keep sticking to) my guns?
>>

>> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>> Garry E.
>> Siegel, M.D.
>> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 9:41 PM
>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>> Subject: Gyn: ASC-US
>>
>> 16 YO P0000 seen by CNM for annual in April, and the pap is ASC-US,
>> reflexed
>> to HR HPV positive.
>>
>> Cancelled appointments, multiple calls--doesn't come in for follow-up.
>>

--
Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
Private Practice
Roswell, GA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:59:56 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.