|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: ? perf at hysteroscopyFrom: DoctorJoe@aol.comTue Aug 28 10:32:50 2007
In a message dated 8/28/2007 10:29:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time, evsono@pipeline.com writes: it depends what you're trying to accomplish ... to drain fluid or to inspect organs. Right. It would be a trade off of what information you can get versus how extensive a "surgery" you need to do. I guess in a completely stable patient, where the only "problem" was unaccounted for fluid, a culdo with the production of (clear) missing fluid would allow you to continue observation (since a simple, nonbleeding perf is pretty benign). On the other hand, NO fluid, or gross blood, would certainly justify a laparoscopy. Joe P.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:59:44 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.