Re: Question about GBS treatment in labor vs prenatally

From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirezt@coqui.net)
Sat Aug 25 09:00:44 2007


I treat GBS once if positive in urine culture - then prophylaxis.. the future is GBS vaccine.

Ef

> At Sat, 25 Aug 2007, GIN11153@aol.com wrote:
>
>As a longtime L&D nurse, I remember when moms were treated for GBS during
>pregnancy, thus attempting to avoid some of the potential complication of GBS
>such as PPROM, preterm labor, chorioamnionitis, etc. I don't understand the
>concept of why nowadays women aren't treated until they go into labor, usually
>weeks after the culture comes back positive which potentially could mean that
>the fetus is affected by the infection for at least 4-5 weeks. Someone posted
> these articles on another listserv that brought this topic up in my mind
>again-thoughts appreciated for my learning experience:
>
>Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;90(2):240-Obs
>
>Persistence of penicillin G benzathine in pregnant group B streptococcus
>carriers.
>Weeks JW, Myers SR, Lasher L, Goldsmith J, Watkins C, Gall SA.
>
>Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Louisiana State University School of
>Medicine, Shreveport, USA. _jweeks1@mail.jweeks1@mjwe_
>(mailto:jweeks1@mail.sh.lsumc.edu)
>
>OBJECTIVE: To determine if streptococcicidal levels of penicillin G
>benzathine can be detected in maternal serum 4 weeks after treatment with 4.8 million
>units. METHODS: Thirty-seven pregnant women with positive group B
>streptococcus vaginal or urine cultures were each given 4.8 million units of penicillin
>G benzathine. Maternal blood samples were collected after injection and at
>delivery. Serum penicillin levels were measured by high-pressure liquid
>chromatography. Follow-up cultures were done when possible. RESULTS: None of the
>patients had serum penicillin levels below 0.20 microgram/mL 30 days after
>treatment. Cord blood levels were approximately 50% lower than maternal levels.
>In all but three subjects, cord blood levels exceeded 0.06 microgram/mL, the
>minimal inhibitory concentration for group B streptococcus. The three
>exceptions were patients who delivered more than 100 days after treatment. Group B
>streptococcus cultures were negative at the time of delivery in 72% of cases.
>None of the patients with positive cultures were moderately or heavily
>colonized. CONCLUSION: In pregnant women, penicillin G benzathine levels are high
>enough to inhibit the growth of group B streptococcus for more than 4 weeks
>after injection with 4.8 million units. Further studies are needed to evaluate
>whether this regimen can prevent neonatal colonization and invasive group B
>streptococcus disease.
>
>PMID: 9241301
>
>Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;183(2):372-Am
>
>Late third-trimester treatment of rectovaginal group B streptococci with
>benzathine penicillin G.
>Bland ML, Vermillion ST, Soper DE.
>
>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South
>Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
>
>OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the efficacy of late third-trimester
>benzathine penicillin G administration in eradicating maternal group B
>streptococcal colonization at delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective trial
>of late third-trimester treatment with benzathine penicillin G versus
>observation in 78 obstetric patients colonized with group B streptococci. Patients
>were screened by use of rectovaginal swabs cultured in selective media between
>34 and 37 completed weeks' gestation. Patients with positive cultures were
>offered antepartum treatment with 4.8 million units of intramuscular benzathine
>penicillin G or observation. Participants in both groups were recultured at
>their delivery admission before receiving standard intrapartum therapy. The
>primary outcome was the frequency of persistent maternal group B streptococcal
>colonization at the delivery admission. Other outcome variables included
>semiquantitative growth characteristics of all group B streptococcal cultures,
>the frequency of neonatal sepsis, and adverse maternal effects. Data were
>analyzed by the Student t test for continuous variables and the chi(2) or Fisher
>exact test for categoric variables, with significance established at P <.05.
>RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to selected demographics,
>gestational age at delivery, and frequency of heavy group B streptococcal growth
>in initial screening cultures. The mean interval from treatment until
>delivery was 19.4 +/- 7.5 days (mean +/- SD). There were no cases of neonatal sepsis
>in either group or any adverse maternal effects attributed to the treatment.
>Group B streptococcal culture characteristics at delivery admission were as
>follows. Positive results for group B streptococci were found in 7 (25%)
>treated patients and 41 (82%) patients under observation (relative risk, 0.30;
>95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.59; P <.0001). Positive results for heavy
>growth of group B streptococci were found in 0 (0%) treated patients and 31 (62%)
>patients under observation (relative risk, 0.01; 95% confidence interval,
>0.00-0.12; P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Treating group B streptococci carriers with
>benzathine penicillin G in the late third trimester eradicates or
>significantly reduces maternal group B streptococcal colonization at delivery. This may
>provide an adjuvant therapy to those mothers at risk for receiving inadequate
>intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis against group B streptococci.
>
>PMID: 10942472
>
>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005 May;17(5):333-J M
>
>Efficacy of intramuscular penicillin in the eradication of group B
>streptococcal colonization at delivery.
>Pinette MG, Thayer K, Wax JR, Blackstone J, Cartin A.
>
>Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and
>Gynecology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine 04102, USA.
>
>OBJECTIVE: Due to rapid deliveries and human error, not all group B
>streptococcal positive mothers will receive adequate prophylactic antibiotic
>treatment in labor. We sought to determine if long acting intramuscular penicillin
>given after a positive culture result would be efficacious in eradicating group
>B streptococcal colonization at the time of delivery. METHODS: Patients
>positive for group B streptococci at 35-37 weeks were randomized to receive 2.4
>million units of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G suspension (Bicillin
>L-A) versus no treatment. Study patients were recultured at the time of
>admission to labor and delivery prior to receiving prophylactic antibiotics
>according to CDC guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were enrolled. A small
>but significant decrease in the rate of group B streptococcal colonization was
>observed in the treatment group (14/27, 52%) versus the control group
>(20/23, 87%), p=0.03. CONCLUSION: The large number of persistent carriers suggests
>that 2.4 million units of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G suspension
>(Bicillin L-A) is insufficient as sole therapy. However, the decline in group B
>streptococcal carriers might lessen the risk of failed or insufficient
>intrapartum treatment. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin G suspension (Bicillin
>L-A) may be useful as an adjunctive treatment for patients at risk for rapid
>delivery, before adequate intrapartum prophylaxis can be given.
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Gail Neuman RNC CPHW
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>student midwife and student nurse practitioner
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>certified high risk OB
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Perinatal Nurse Associates
>801 N. Tustin Ave., Suite 305
>Santa Ana, CA 92705
>(714) 314-7070
>(714) 838-1479 fax
>

--
“ The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge.” Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:57:23 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.