Re: Pregnancy At Altitude

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Wed Aug 22 20:59:06 2007


I look forward to the day when we'll see an article on "Pregnancy in Space" posted.

Art

At Wed, 22 Aug 2007, ainsron wrote: >
>Occupational and environmental reproductive hazards, by Paul states:
>"Commercial air travel and acute exposure to altitudes less than 15,000 ft
>pose no adverse on maternal or fetal well-being. Pregnant women with
>medical problems (anemia, sickle cell, cardiac problems, etc.) that might be
>exacerbated by hypoxic environments should be carefully counseled.
>Avoidance of high altitudes us use of supplemental oxygen during flight may
>be necessary for these women."
>
>It differentiates between acute and chronic exposure, pointing out that IUGR
>is related to babies born above 10,000 feet, according to a study of
>Colorado women who lived above that altitude.
>
>Acute changes of altitude during flight do not appear to have an adverse
>effect on pregnancy outcome, studies of exposure to commercial jet travel
>with cabin pressures comparable to 8000 ft show small increases in maternal
>HR and no change in BP. Fetal monitoring during flight have shown no
>changes in FHR or variability.
>
>Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Joe
>Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:53 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: Pregnancy At Altitude
>
>reminds me of the Mount Everest syndrome that Eastman(?) studied. Fetal
>Hb protected . Joe C
>
>Lynn Montgomery wrote:
>
>> Bernt Schumacher did a study using rabbit models in a pressure system
>> simulating an airline cabin (approximately 10,000 ft). I believe he
>> found increased lactate levels in both the moms and the pups (via cord
>> sampling), but I do not believe there was increased pregnancy wastage or
>> other untoward outcome.
>> Lynn
>>
>> Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D.
>> Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maternal-Fetal Medicine
>> The Birth Center/Rocky Mountain Women's Health
>> 1211 S. Reserve St.
>> Missoula, Montana, 59801
>> 406-549-0978
>> fax 406-549-0987
>> e-mail: apgar10@thebirthcentermt.com
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Dean
>> Huffman .
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:23 PM
>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>> Subject: Pregnancy At Altitude
>>
>> .
>>
>> Does anybody have references or sources that discuss risks (if any) to
>> first
>> trimester pregnancies from altitude exposure. Specficially a five day
>> vacation
>> to Colorado at 9000 feet with short trips by jeep to higher altitudes
>> for brief
>> periods of time.
>>

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:59:44 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.