Re: Cefzolin debate

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Sun Aug 12 08:36:00 2007


Medicine swings like a pendulum do - apologies to Roger Miller.

Art

At Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Efrain Ramirez wrote: >
>I don’t think that this issue has been settled.. I give it after cord
>clamping.. I am willing to change, of course, but, IMHO, more RCT
>studies are needed.... I personally believe that it doesn’t make any
>difference to the mother – I am not too sure about the baby.
>
>Ef
>
>> At Sat, 11 Aug 2007, RModugno@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>Controversy in our practice rages over giving prophylactic cefzolin prior to
>>incision at C/S or after cord clamping.
>>
>>I give it prior to incision in keeping with guidelines for general or GYN
>>surgery.
>>
>>This article has helped my cause:
>>
>> Administration of Cefazolin Prior to Skin Incision is Superior to Cefazolin
>>at Cord Clamping in Preventing Post-Cesarean Infectious Morbidity
>>_Scott Sullivan_
>>(http://www.obgyn.net/smfm2007/index.cfm?dynpage=CVs/Scott_Sullivan) 1, Triz Smith2, Eugene Chang1, Thomas Hulsey3, J. Van Dorsten1,
>>David Soper1,
>>
>>1Medical University of South Carolina, Obstetrics and Gynecology,
>>Charleston, South Carolina, 2Medical University of South Carolina,
>>Obstetrics/Gynecology, Charleston, South Carolina, 3Medical University of South Carolina,
>>Pediatrics, Charleston, South Carolina
>>Abstract
>>Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether the
>>administration of Cefazolin prior to skin incision was superior to administration at
>>the time of umbilical cord clamping for the prevention of post-cesarean
>>infectious morbidity.
>>Study Design: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind
>>placebo-controlled trial. Study subjects received 1 gram of Cefazolin at least 15 minutes
>>prior to skin incision. Control subjects received the same antibiotic at the
>>time of cord clamping. Subjects were followed for the occurrence of
>>endomyometritis, wound infection and other infectious morbidity. Neonatal outcomes
>>were collected for occurrence of sepsis, septic workups and length of stay.
>>Results: 367 subjects were enrolled in the trial and 357 completed follow
>>up. There were no demographic differences observed between the study and
>>control groups including age (p = 0.87), race (p = 0.8) or insurance (p = 0.86).
>>There were no differences seen in clinical variables between groups including
>>diabetes (p = 0.1), weight (p = 0.49) or indication for cesarean. There was
>>decreased total infectious morbidity in the study group [RR = 0.4, 95 % CL
>>0.18-0.87], decreased endometritis [RR = 0.2 95 % CL 0.15-0.94] and a trend
>>toward decreased wound infections [RR = 0.52 95 % CL 0.18-1.5]. No increase in
>>0.2) was observed in the study group.
>>Conclusion: Administration of prophylactic Cefazolin prior to skin incision
>>resulted in a decrease in both endomyometritis and total post-cesarean
>>infectious morbidity compared to administration of the same dose at the time of
>>cord clamping. This dosing did not result in increased neonatal sepsis, septic
>>workup or admission days.
>>American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
>>_Volume 195, Issue 6, Supplement S (December 2006)_
>>(http://www.ajog.org/issues/contents?issue_key=TOC@@JOURNALS@YAJOG@0195@0006s0)
>>*******************************************
>>What do you folks do?
>>*******************************************

>>*******************************************
>>
>>Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
>>Sylva, NC
>>

>>************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
>
>--

>“ The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
>it is the illusion of knowledge.” Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian
>

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:59:44 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.