Re: sinks vs. sanitizers

From: Betsy Hyde (elishyde@mindspring.com)
Fri Jul 27 13:46:00 2007


at OBGYN M&M yesterday they stated that c.diff spores were not removed by the gels, only by soap and water.

--
Betsy Hyde CNM
Branford, CT

On Jul 27, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Joanne Bulley, MD wrote:

> Myer, I am not sure this is correct -- this article suggests that 10% > povidone iodine and 70% ethyl alcohol are best: > > Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;22(2):105-8.Click here to > read > Links > Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing > methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from contaminated hands. > Guilhermetti M, Hernandes SE, Fukushigue Y, Garcia LB, Cardoso CL. > > Department of Clinical Analyses, State University of Maringá, Paraná, > Brazil. > > OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents in removing a > hospital strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from > artificially contaminated hands of five volunteers was studied. > DESIGN: > The products used were plain liquid soap, ethyl alcohol 70% (by > weight), > 10% povidone-iodine liquid soap (PVP-I), and chlorhexidine gluconate > (4%) detergent. The experiments were performed using a Latin square > statistical design, with two 5x4 randomized blocks. The removal rates > of S aureus cells from contaminated fingertips were estimated by > analysis of variance, the response variable being the log10 reduction > factor (RF), ie, log10 of the initial counts minus log10 of the final > counts. In the first and second blocks, the fingertips of the > volunteers were contaminated in mean with 3.76 log10 colony-forming > units ([CFU] light-contamination hand) and 6.82 log10 CFU > (heavy-contamination hand), respectively. RESULTS: In the first > block, > there were significant differences between treatments (P<.05). The > 10% > PVP-I (RF, 3.76) and 70% ethyl alcohol (RF, 3.51) had significantly > higher removal rates than plain liquid soap (RF, 1.96) and 4% > chlorhexidine (RF, 1.91). In the second block, 10% PVP-I (RF, > 4.39) and > 70% ethyl alcohol (RF, 3.27) also were significantly more effective > than > plain liquid soap (RF, 1.77) and 4% chlorhexidine (RF, 1.37; P<.05). > Plain liquid soap was significantly more effective than chlorhexidine > (4%) detergent. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that 10% PVP-I > and 70% > ethyl alcohol may be the most effective hand-cleansing agents for > removing methicillin-resistant S aureus strain from either lightly or > heavily contaminated hands. > > PMID: 11232870 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] > > Joanne > > At Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Myer Bornstein wrote: >> >> Remember MSRA is out there and patient carry the spores and they >> do not have >> to be sick and the alcohol sanitizers do not work on spores only >> soap and >> water work. Sinks in the exam rooms >> Myer >> > > -- > Joanne Bulley, MD, FACOG > Solo gyn > Keene, NH USA





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:57:04 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.